mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ShuffleMix: Improving Representations via Channel-Wise Shuffle of Interpolated Hidden States

arXiv 2305.18684 ↗First posted 30 May 2023cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Mixup style data augmentation algorithms have been widely adopted in various tasks as implicit network regularization on representation learning to improve model generalization, which can be achieved by a linear interpolation of labeled samples in input or feature space as well as target space. Inspired by good robustness of alternative dropout strategies against over-fitting on limited patterns of training samples, this paper introduces a novel concept of ShuffleMix -- Shuffle of Mixed hidden features, which can be interpreted as a kind of dropout operation in feature space. Specifically, our ShuffleMix method favors a simple linear shuffle of randomly selected feature channels for feature mixup in-between training samples to leverage semantic interpolated supervision signals, which can be extended to a generalized shuffle operation via additionally combining linear interpolations of intra-channel features. Compared to its direct competitor of feature augmentation -- the Manifold Mixup, the proposed ShuffleMix can gain superior generalization, owing to imposing more flexible and smooth constraints on generating samples and achieving regularization effects of channel-wise feature dropout. Experimental results on several public benchmarking datasets of single-label and multi-label visual classification tasks can confirm the effectiveness of our method on consistently improving representations over the state-of-the-art mixup augmentation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2023.

Builds on

44 of 64 references.

References · 44

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  5. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  7. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  8. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  9. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,628
  10. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,239
  11. 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,200
  12. 2020Asymmetric Loss For Multi-Label Classificationcited by 381
32 more
  1. 2019Multi-Label Image Recognition with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 322
  2. 2018DropBlock: A regularization method for convolutional networkscited by 262
  3. 2020Puzzle Mix: Exploiting Saliency and Local Statistics for Optimal Mixupcited by 261
  4. 2014Efficient Object Localization Using Convolutional Networkscited by 227
  5. 2021R-Drop: Regularized Dropout for Neural Networkscited by 202
  6. 2020How Does Mixup Help With Robustness and Generalization?cited by 193
  7. 2016CNN-RNN: A Unified Framework for Multi-label Image Classificationcited by 190
  8. 2018MixUp as Locally Linear Out-Of-Manifold Regularizationcited by 158
  9. 2020SaliencyMix: A Saliency Guided Data Augmentation Strategy for Better Regularizationcited by 149
  10. 2021Re-labeling ImageNet: from Single to Multi-Labels, from Global to Localized Labelscited by 118
  11. 2020The Emerging Trends of Multi-Label Learningcited by 100
  12. 2020Fine-Grained Visual Classification via Progressive Multi-Granularity Training of Jigsaw Patchescited by 92
  13. 2017Multi-label Image Recognition by Recurrently Discovering Attentional Regionscited by 83
  14. 2020On Mixup Regularizationcited by 83
  15. 2020The Implicit and Explicit Regularization Effects of Dropoutcited by 71
  16. 2020The Devil is in the Channels: Mutual-Channel Loss for Fine-Grained Image Classificationcited by 64
  17. 2014CNN: Single-label to Multi-labelcited by 63
  18. 2018Data augmentation instead of explicit regularizationcited by 63
  19. 2015Part-Stacked CNN for Fine-Grained Visual Categorizationcited by 62
  20. 2020SnapMix: Semantically Proportional Mixing for Augmenting Fine-grained Datacited by 56
  21. 2017Between-class Learning for Image Classificationcited by 50
  22. 2017Recurrent Attentional Reinforcement Learning for Multi-label Image Recognitioncited by 44
  23. 2018Geometric Understanding of Deep Learningcited by 41
  24. 2021AlignMixup: Improving Representations By Interpolating Aligned Featurescited by 33
  25. 2017A Geometric View of Optimal Transportation and Generative Modelcited by 31
  26. 2015Dropout as data augmentationcited by 27
  27. 2021Noisy Feature Mixupcited by 27
  28. 2016Multi-Label Image Classification with Regional Latent Semantic Dependenciescited by 23
  29. 2018On the Implicit Bias of Dropoutcited by 22
  30. 2020Deep Semantic Dictionary Learning for Multi-label Image Classificationcited by 20
  31. 2020Weakly Supervised Attention Pyramid Convolutional Neural Network for Fine-Grained Visual Classificationcited by 18
  32. 2022Shuffle Augmentation of Features from Unlabeled Data for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.