Syntax and Semantics Meet in the "Middle": Probing the Syntax-Semantics Interface of LMs Through Agentivity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in large language models have prompted researchers to examine their abilities across a variety of linguistic tasks, but little has been done to investigate how models handle the interactions in meaning across words and larger syntactic forms -- i.e. phenomena at the intersection of syntax and semantics. We present the semantic notion of agentivity as a case study for probing such interactions. We created a novel evaluation dataset by utilitizing the unique linguistic properties of a subset of optionally transitive English verbs. This dataset was used to prompt varying sizes of three model classes to see if they are sensitive to agentivity at the lexical level, and if they can appropriately employ these word-level priors given a specific syntactic context. Overall, GPT-3 text-davinci-003 performs extremely well across all experiments, outperforming all other models tested by far. In fact, the results are even better correlated with human judgements than both syntactic and semantic corpus statistics. This suggests that LMs may potentially serve as more useful tools for linguistic annotation, theory testing, and discovery than select corpora for certain tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/lindiatjuatja/lm_sem
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2023.
Builds on
17 of 51 references.
References · 17
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,984
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
- 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 354
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 320
- 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 263
- 2018Colorless green recurrent networks dream hierarchicallycited by 213
- 2020Probing Pretrained Language Models for Lexical Semanticscited by 156
- 2019Neural Language Models as Psycholinguistic Subjects: Representations of Syntactic Statecited by 138
- 2020Syntactic Structure from Deep Learningcited by 99
5 more
- 2018What do RNN Language Models Learn about Filler-Gap Dependencies?cited by 86
- 2021Counterfactual Interventions Reveal the Causal Effect of Relative Clause Representations on Agreement Predictioncited by 59
- 2022The Better Your Syntax, the Better Your Semantics? Probing Pretrained Language Models for the English Comparative Correlativecited by 35
- 2022Neural reality of argument structure constructionscited by 25
- 2023A Discerning Several Thousand Judgments: GPT-3 Rates the Article + Adjective + Numeral + Noun Constructioncited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.