Unsupervised Selective Rationalization with Noise Injection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A major issue with using deep learning models in sensitive applications is that they provide no explanation for their output. To address this problem, unsupervised selective rationalization produces rationales alongside predictions by chaining two jointly-trained components, a rationale generator and a predictor. Although this architecture guarantees that the prediction relies solely on the rationale, it does not ensure that the rationale contains a plausible explanation for the prediction. We introduce a novel training technique that effectively limits generation of implausible rationales by injecting noise between the generator and the predictor. Furthermore, we propose a new benchmark for evaluating unsupervised selective rationalization models using movie reviews from existing datasets. We achieve sizeable improvements in rationale plausibility and task accuracy over the state-of-the-art across a variety of tasks, including our new benchmark, while maintaining or improving model faithfulness.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2023.
Builds on
22 of 34 references.
References · 22
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,375
- 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,304
- 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,060
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
- 2020BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classificationcited by 316
- 2016Rationalizing Neural Predictionscited by 281
- 2018Learning to Explain: An Information-Theoretic Perspective on Model Interpretationcited by 248
- 2020Invariant Rationalizationcited by 131
10 more
- 2019Interpretable Neural Predictions with Differentiable Binary Variablescited by 126
- 2020Learning to Faithfully Rationalize by Constructioncited by 113
- 2013From Amateurs to Connoisseurs: Modeling the Evolution of User Expertise through Online Reviewscited by 108
- 2018L-Shapley and C-Shapley: Efficient Model Interpretation for Structured Datacited by 100
- 2019Rethinking Cooperative Rationalization: Introspective Extraction and Complement Controlcited by 96
- 2020Aligning Faithful Interpretations with their Social Attributioncited by 79
- 2020An Information Bottleneck Approach for Controlling Conciseness in Rationale Extractioncited by 69
- 2021Understanding Interlocking Dynamics of Cooperative Rationalizationcited by 36
- 2019A Game Theoretic Approach to Class-wise Selective Rationalizationcited by 32
- 2021The Irrationality of Neural Rationale Modelscited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
- 2025Breaking Free from MMI: A New Frontier in Rationalization by Probing Input Utilizationcited by 6
- 2025Adversarial Cooperative Rationalization: The Risk of Spurious Correlations in Even Clean Datasetscited by 6
- 2025Learnable Game-theoretic Policy Optimization for Data-centric Self-explanation Rationalizationcited by 1
- 2025Learnable Game-theoretic Policy Optimization for Data-centric Self-explanation Rationalization15 Oct 2025
- 2025Adversarial Cooperative Rationalization: The Risk of Spurious Correlations in Even Clean Datasets4 May 2025
- 2025Breaking Free from MMI: A New Frontier in Rationalization by Probing Input Utilization8 Mar 2025