mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning and Collusion in Multi-unit Auctions

arXiv 2305.17402 ↗First posted 27 May 2023cs.GT cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider repeated multi-unit auctions with uniform pricing, which are widely used in practice for allocating goods such as carbon licenses. In each round, K identical units of a good are sold to a group of buyers that have valuations with diminishing marginal returns. The buyers submit bids for the units, and then a price p is set per unit so that all the units are sold. We consider two variants of the auction, where the price is set to the K-th highest bid and (K+1)-st highest bid, respectively. We analyze the properties of this auction in both the offline and online settings. In the offline setting, we consider the problem that one player i is facing: given access to a data set that contains the bids submitted by competitors in past auctions, find a bid vector that maximizes player i's cumulative utility on the data set. We design a polynomial time algorithm for this problem, by showing it is equivalent to finding a maximum-weight path on a carefully constructed directed acyclic graph. In the online setting, the players run learning algorithms to update their bids as they participate in the auction over time. Based on our offline algorithm, we design efficient online learning algorithms for bidding. The algorithms have sublinear regret, under both full information and bandit feedback structures. We complement our online learning algorithms with regret lower bounds. Finally, we analyze the quality of the equilibria in the worst case through the lens of the core solution concept in the game among the bidders. We show that the (K+1)-st price format is susceptible to collusion among the bidders; meanwhile, the K-th price format does not have this issue.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 120 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2023.

Builds on

33 of 120 references.

References · 33

  1. 2014Lipschitz Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 59
  2. 2019Beating Stochastic and Adversarial Semi-bandits Optimally and Simultaneouslycited by 53
  3. 2016The End of Optimism? An Asymptotic Analysis of Finite-Armed Linear Banditscited by 48
  4. 2017Selling to a No-Regret Buyercited by 43
  5. 2021Online Learning via Offline Greedy Algorithms: Applications in Market Design and Optimizationcited by 40
  6. 2015Online learning in repeated auctionscited by 39
  7. 2017Learning to Bid Without Knowing your Valuecited by 34
  8. 2020Dynamic Incentive-aware Learning: Robust Pricing in Contextual Auctionscited by 34
  9. 2020Optimal No-regret Learning in Repeated First-price Auctionscited by 33
  10. 2020Learning to Bid Optimally and Efficiently in Adversarial First-price Auctionscited by 33
  11. 2018Contextual Bandits with Cross-learningcited by 31
  12. 2020Stochastic Shortest Path with Adversarially Changing Costscited by 28
21 more
  1. 2015Learning in Auctions: Regret is Hard, Envy is Easycited by 23
  2. 2016Learning Simple Auctionscited by 23
  3. 2017Learning Multi-item Auctions with (or without) Samplescited by 18
  4. 2020Learning in repeated auctionscited by 15
  5. 2019Incentive-aware Contextual Pricing with Non-parametric Market Noisecited by 13
  6. 2020Optimal Learning for Structured Banditscited by 13
  7. 2016The Price of Anarchy in Auctionscited by 11
  8. 2014Combinatorial Auctions via Posted Pricescited by 7
  9. 2013Efficiency Guarantees in Auctions with Budgetscited by 5
  10. 2014Mechanisms for Multi-Unit Auctionscited by 3
  11. 2019LP-based Approximation for Personalized Reserve Pricescited by 3
  12. 2017Walrasian Dynamics in Multi-unit Marketscited by 2
  13. 2019Reducing Inefficiency in Carbon Auctions with Imperfect Competitioncited by 2
  14. 2020Beating Greedy For Approximating Reserve Prices in Multi-Unit VCG Auctionscited by 2
  15. 2021Making Auctions Robust to Aftermarketscited by 2
  16. 2013On the Efficiency of the Walrasian Mechanismcited by 1
  17. 2015The Invisible Hand of Dynamic Market Pricingcited by 1
  18. 2016Walrasian Pricing in Multi-unit Auctionscited by 1
  19. 2016Posted Pricing sans Discriminationcited by 1
  20. 2017Optimal Multi-Unit Mechanisms with Private Demandscited by 1
  21. 2017On Approximate Welfare- and Revenue-Maximizing Equilibria for Size-Interchangeable Bidderscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

5 papers.