mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

All about sample-size calculations for A/B testing: Novel extensions and practical guide

arXiv 2305.16459 ↗First posted 25 May 2023stat.ME stat.APcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While there exists a large amount of literature on the general challenges of and best practices for trustworthy online A/B testing, there are limited studies on sample size estimation, which plays a crucial role in trustworthy and efficient A/B testing that ensures the resulting inference has a sufficient power and type I error control. For example, when sample size is under-estimated, the statistical inference, even with the correct analysis methods, will not be able to detect the true significant improvement leading to misinformed and costly decisions. This paper addresses this fundamental gap by developing new sample size calculation methods for correlated data, as well as absolute vs. relative treatment effects, both ubiquitous in online experiments. Additionally, we address a practical question of the minimal observed difference that will be statistically significant and how it relates to average treatment effect and sample size calculation. All proposed methods are accompanied by mathematical proofs, illustrative examples, and simulations. We end by sharing some best practices on various practical topics on sample size calculation and experimental design.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 May 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.