mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On Influence Functions, Classification Influence, Relative Influence, Memorization and Generalization

arXiv 2305.16094 ↗First posted 25 May 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning systems such as large scale recommendation systems or natural language processing systems are usually trained on billions of training points and are associated with hundreds of billions or trillions of parameters. Improving the learning process in such a way that both the training load is reduced and the model accuracy improved is highly desired. In this paper we take a first step toward solving this problem, studying influence functions from the perspective of simplifying the computations they involve. We discuss assumptions, under which influence computations can be performed on significantly fewer parameters. We also demonstrate that the sign of the influence value can indicate whether a training point is to memorize, as opposed to generalize upon. For this purpose we formally define what memorization means for a training point, as opposed to generalization. We conclude that influence functions can be made practical, even for large scale machine learning systems, and that influence values can be taken into account by algorithms that selectively remove training points, as part of the learning process.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 6 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2023.

Builds on

4 of 6 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  2. 2019Less Is Better: Unweighted Data Subsampling via Influence Functioncited by 30
  3. 2020Finding Influential Instances for Distantly Supervised Relation Extractioncited by 13
  4. 2017Optimal Sub-sampling with Influence Functionscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.