Impact of Log Parsing on Deep Learning-Based Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Software systems log massive amounts of data, recording important runtime information. Such logs are used, for example, for log-based anomaly detection, which aims to automatically detect abnormal behaviors of the system under analysis by processing the information recorded in its logs. Many log-based anomaly detection techniques based on deep learning models include a pre-processing step called log parsing. However, understanding the impact of log parsing on the accuracy of anomaly detection techniques has received surprisingly little attention so far. Investigating what are the key properties log parsing techniques should ideally have to help anomaly detection is therefore warranted. In this paper, we report on a comprehensive empirical study on the impact of log parsing on anomaly detection accuracy, using 13 log parsing techniques, seven anomaly detection techniques (five based on deep learning and two based on traditional machine learning) on three publicly available log datasets. Our empirical results show that, despite what is widely assumed, there is no strong correlation between log parsing accuracy and anomaly detection accuracy, regardless of the metric used for measuring log parsing accuracy. Moreover, we experimentally confirm existing theoretical results showing that it is a property that we refer to as distinguishability in log parsing results as opposed to their accuracy that plays an essential role in achieving accurate anomaly detection.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 May 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023A Comprehensive Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Log-Based Anomaly Detectioncited by 4
- 2025ADALog: Adaptive Unsupervised Anomaly detection in Logs with Self-attention Masked Language Modelcited by 2
- 2025A Multi-Dataset Evaluation of Models for Automated Vulnerability Repaircited by 1
- 2026Protocol-Sensitive Evaluation of Log Anomaly Detection: Component Costs and Target-Access Sensitivity on HDFS and BGLcited by 0
- 2026Protocol-Sensitive Evaluation of Log Anomaly Detection: Component Costs and Target-Access Sensitivity on HDFS and BGL5 Oct 2026
- 2025A Multi-Dataset Evaluation of Models for Automated Vulnerability Repair5 Jun 2025
- 2025ADALog: Adaptive Unsupervised Anomaly detection in Logs with Self-attention Masked Language Model15 May 2025
- 2023A Comprehensive Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Log-Based Anomaly Detection31 Jul 2023