Malicious or Benign? Towards Effective Content Moderation for Children's Videos
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Online video platforms receive hundreds of hours of uploads every minute, making manual content moderation impossible. Unfortunately, the most vulnerable consumers of malicious video content are children from ages 1-5 whose attention is easily captured by bursts of color and sound. Scammers attempting to monetize their content may craft malicious children's videos that are superficially similar to educational videos, but include scary and disgusting characters, violent motions, loud music, and disturbing noises. Prominent video hosting platforms like YouTube have taken measures to mitigate malicious content on their platform, but these videos often go undetected by current content moderation tools that are focused on removing pornographic or copyrighted content. This paper introduces our toolkit Malicious or Benign for promoting research on automated content moderation of children's videos. We present 1) a customizable annotation tool for videos, 2) a new dataset with difficult to detect test cases of malicious content and 3) a benchmark suite of state-of-the-art video classification models.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.
Builds on
13 of 39 references.
References · 13
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
- 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
- 2014Long-term Recurrent Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition and Descriptioncited by 484
- 2021Video Transformer Networkcited by 272
- 2015Beyond Short Snippets: Deep Networks for Video Classificationcited by 233
- 2019Disturbed YouTube for Kids: Characterizing and Detecting Inappropriate Videos Targeting Young Childrencited by 13
- 2021Hate, Obscenity, and Insults: Measuring the Exposure of Children to Inappropriate Comments in YouTubecited by 4
- 2022YouTubers Not madeForKids: Detecting Channels Sharing Inappropriate Videos Targeting Childrencited by 4
- 2016KidsTube: Detection, Characterization and Analysis of Child Unsafe Content & Promoters on YouTubecited by 3
- 2019Combating the Elsagate phenomenon: Deep learning architectures for disturbing cartoonscited by 3
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024SafeWatch: An Efficient Safety-Policy Following Video Guardrail Model with Transparent Explanationscited by 38
- 2024VideoEval: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Low-Cost Evaluation of Video Foundation Modelcited by 12
- 2024Enhanced Multimodal Content Moderation of Children's Videos using Audiovisual Fusioncited by 4
- 2023The Potential of Vision-Language Models for Content Moderation of Children's Videoscited by 2
- 2026Child-Oriented AIGC Video Risk Reviewing: A Benchmark and Knowledge-Supported Iterative Reasoning Frameworkcited by 0
- 2026Child-Oriented AIGC Video Risk Reviewing: A Benchmark and Knowledge-Supported Iterative Reasoning Framework21 Jul 2026
- 2024SafeWatch: An Efficient Safety-Policy Following Video Guardrail Model with Transparent Explanations9 Dec 2024
- 2024VideoEval: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Low-Cost Evaluation of Video Foundation Model9 Jul 2024
- 2024Enhanced Multimodal Content Moderation of Children's Videos using Audiovisual Fusion9 May 2024
- 2023The Potential of Vision-Language Models for Content Moderation of Children's Videos6 Dec 2023