C-STS: Conditional Semantic Textual Similarity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Semantic textual similarity (STS), a cornerstone task in NLP, measures the degree of similarity between a pair of sentences, and has broad application in fields such as information retrieval and natural language understanding. However, sentence similarity can be inherently ambiguous, depending on the specific aspect of interest. We resolve this ambiguity by proposing a novel task called Conditional STS (C-STS) which measures sentences' similarity conditioned on an feature described in natural language (hereon, condition). As an example, the similarity between the sentences "The NBA player shoots a three-pointer." and "A man throws a tennis ball into the air to serve." is higher for the condition "The motion of the ball" (both upward) and lower for "The size of the ball" (one large and one small). C-STS's advantages are two-fold: (1) it reduces the subjectivity and ambiguity of STS and (2) enables fine-grained language model evaluation through diverse natural language conditions. We put several state-of-the-art models to the test, and even those performing well on STS (e.g. SimCSE, Flan-T5, and GPT-4) find C-STS challenging; all with Spearman correlation scores below 50. To encourage a more comprehensive evaluation of semantic similarity and natural language understanding, we make nearly 19K C-STS examples and code available for others to train and test their models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.
Builds on
25 of 51 references.
References · 25
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
13 more
- 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
- 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
- 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
- 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 428
- 2022One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddingscited by 329
- 2019Poly-encoders: Transformer Architectures and Pre-training Strategies for Fast and Accurate Multi-sentence Scoringcited by 164
- 2022DiffCSE: Difference-based Contrastive Learning for Sentence Embeddingscited by 131
- 2022Task-aware Retrieval with Instructionscited by 107
- 2022PromptBERT: Improving BERT Sentence Embeddings with Promptscited by 75
- 2020Crisscrossed Captions: Extended Intramodal and Intermodal Semantic Similarity Judgments for MS-COCOcited by 46
- 2021What Makes Sentences Semantically Related: A Textual Relatedness Dataset and Empirical Studycited by 15
- 2016Interpretable Semantic Textual Similarity: Finding and explaining differences between sentencescited by 5
- 2022Identifying Ambiguous Similarity Conditions via Semantic Matchingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.
- 2024RAR-b: Reasoning as Retrieval Benchmarkcited by 33
- 2024Challenges and Opportunities in Text Generation Explainabilitycited by 2
- 2024Challenges and Opportunities in Text Generation Explainability14 May 2024
- 2024RAR-b: Reasoning as Retrieval Benchmark9 Apr 2024