Improving Factuality of Abstractive Summarization without Sacrificing Summary Quality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Improving factual consistency of abstractive summarization has been a widely studied topic. However, most of the prior works on training factuality-aware models have ignored the negative effect it has on summary quality. We propose EFACTSUM (i.e., Effective Factual Summarization), a candidate summary generation and ranking technique to improve summary factuality without sacrificing summary quality. We show that using a contrastive learning framework with our refined candidate summaries leads to significant gains on both factuality and similarity-based metrics. Specifically, we propose a ranking strategy in which we effectively combine two metrics, thereby preventing any conflict during training. Models trained using our approach show up to 6 points of absolute improvement over the base model with respect to FactCC on XSUM and 11 points on CNN/DM, without negatively affecting either similarity-based metrics or absractiveness.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.
Builds on
28 of 36 references.
References · 28
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,317
- 2019PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 1,102
- 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
- 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 584
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
- 2018Newsroom: A Dataset of 1.3 Million Summaries with Diverse Extractive Strategiescited by 294
- 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 287
- 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 244
16 more
- 2019Neural Text Summarization: A Critical Evaluationcited by 189
- 2022BRIO: Bringing Order to Abstractive Summarizationcited by 161
- 2021Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarizationcited by 131
- 2021Hallucinated but Factual! Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 129
- 2020Evaluating Factuality in Generation with Dependency-level Entailmentcited by 122
- 2021CLIFF: Contrastive Learning for Improving Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 120
- 2021Entity-level Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 118
- 2020Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Modelscited by 108
- 2022Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error Detectorscited by 104
- 2021Improving Faithfulness in Abstractive Summarization with Contrast Candidate Generation and Selectioncited by 76
- 2020Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 66
- 2021Improving Factual Consistency of Abstractive Summarization via Question Answeringcited by 55
- 2021Faithful or Extractive? On Mitigating the Faithfulness-Abstractiveness Trade-off in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 51
- 2022FactPEGASUS: Factuality-Aware Pre-training and Fine-tuning for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 49
- 2022Correcting Diverse Factual Errors in Abstractive Summarization via Post-Editing and Language Model Infillingcited by 38
- 2021Evaluating the Tradeoff Between Abstractiveness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Modelscited by 84
- 2024From Instructions to Constraints: Language Model Alignment with Automatic Constraint Verificationcited by 8
- 2024Leveraging language models for summarizing mental state examinations: A comprehensive evaluation and dataset releasecited by 2
- 2024Assisting humans in complex comparisons: automated information comparison at scalecited by 0
- 2024Detecting Response Generation Not Requiring Factual Judgmentcited by 0
- 2026Enhancing Factuality through Consensus and Consistency in Summarization Using Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 0
- 2026Decoupling Generation and Selection for Budget-Constrained Faithful Summarizationcited by 0
- 2026Decoupling Generation and Selection for Budget-Constrained Faithful Summarization4 Aug 2026
- 2026Enhancing Factuality through Consensus and Consistency in Summarization Using Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding28 May 2026
- 2024Detecting Response Generation Not Requiring Factual Judgment14 Jun 2024
- 2024Assisting humans in complex comparisons: automated information comparison at scale5 Apr 2024
- 2024Leveraging language models for summarizing mental state examinations: A comprehensive evaluation and dataset release29 Mar 2024
- 2024From Instructions to Constraints: Language Model Alignment with Automatic Constraint Verification10 Mar 2024
- 2023Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Models13 Sep 2023