mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

InteractiveIE: Towards Assessing the Strength of Human-AI Collaboration in Improving the Performance of Information Extraction

arXiv 2305.14659 ↗First posted 24 May 2023cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning template based information extraction from documents is a crucial yet difficult task. Prior template-based IE approaches assume foreknowledge of the domain templates; however, real-world IE do not have pre-defined schemas and it is a figure-out-as you go phenomena. To quickly bootstrap templates in a real-world setting, we need to induce template slots from documents with zero or minimal supervision. Since the purpose of question answering intersect with the goal of information extraction, we use automatic question generation to induce template slots from the documents and investigate how a tiny amount of a proxy human-supervision on-the-fly (termed as InteractiveIE) can further boost the performance. Extensive experiments on biomedical and legal documents, where obtaining training data is expensive, reveal encouraging trends of performance improvement using InteractiveIE over AI-only baseline.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.

Builds on

23 of 42 references.

References · 23

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  4. 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,407
  5. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,076
  6. 2022Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Modelscited by 1,075
  7. 2022PAL: Program-aided Language Modelscited by 652
  8. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
  9. 2021CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Reviewcited by 236
  10. 2021PAQ: 65 Million Probably-Asked Questions and What You Can Do With Themcited by 200
  11. 2022Maieutic Prompting: Logically Consistent Reasoning with Recursive Explanationscited by 159
  12. 2023ChatGPT or Human? Detect and Explain. Explaining Decisions of Machine Learning Model for Detecting Short ChatGPT-generated Textcited by 85
11 more
  1. 2018Neural Open Information Extractioncited by 50
  2. 2020SelfORE: Self-supervised Relational Feature Learning for Open Relation Extractioncited by 43
  3. 2021The Future is not One-dimensional: Complex Event Schema Induction by Graph Modeling for Event Predictioncited by 40
  4. 2019Reading the Manual: Event Extraction as Definition Comprehensioncited by 26
  5. 2023Bot or Human? Detecting ChatGPT Imposters with A Single Questioncited by 26
  6. 2023Improved Trust in Human-Robot Collaboration with ChatGPTcited by 18
  7. 2020Revisiting Unsupervised Relation Extractioncited by 11
  8. 2023Humans are Still Better than ChatGPT: Case of the IEEEXtreme Competitioncited by 5
  9. 2021Slot Filling for Biomedical Information Extractioncited by 3
  10. 2023PromptORE -- A Novel Approach Towards Fully Unsupervised Relation Extractioncited by 3
  11. 2023PIE-QG: Paraphrased Information Extraction for Unsupervised Question Generation from Small Corporacited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.