Adversarial Nibbler: A Data-Centric Challenge for Improving the Safety of Text-to-Image Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The generative AI revolution in recent years has been spurred by an expansion in compute power and data quantity, which together enable extensive pre-training of powerful text-to-image (T2I) models. With their greater capabilities to generate realistic and creative content, these T2I models like DALL-E, MidJourney, Imagen or Stable Diffusion are reaching ever wider audiences. Any unsafe behaviors inherited from pretraining on uncurated internet-scraped datasets thus have the potential to cause wide-reaching harm, for example, through generated images which are violent, sexually explicit, or contain biased and derogatory stereotypes. Despite this risk of harm, we lack systematic and structured evaluation datasets to scrutinize model behavior, especially adversarial attacks that bypass existing safety filters. A typical bottleneck in safety evaluation is achieving a wide coverage of different types of challenging examples in the evaluation set, i.e., identifying 'unknown unknowns' or long-tail problems. To address this need, we introduce the Adversarial Nibbler challenge. The goal of this challenge is to crowdsource a diverse set of failure modes and reward challenge participants for successfully finding safety vulnerabilities in current state-of-the-art T2I models. Ultimately, we aim to provide greater awareness of these issues and assist developers in improving the future safety and reliability of generative AI models. Adversarial Nibbler is a data-centric challenge, part of the DataPerf challenge suite, organized and supported by Kaggle and MLCommons.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.
Builds on
24 of 38 references.
References · 24
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
- 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,355
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 729
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
- 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
- 2021Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypescited by 327
- 2019Revealing the Dark Secrets of BERTcited by 301
- 2022Red-Teaming the Stable Diffusion Safety Filtercited by 264
- 2020Learning from the Worst: Dynamically Generated Datasets to Improve Online Hate Detectioncited by 221
- 2021What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?cited by 203
12 more
- 2023Auditing large language models: a three-layered approachcited by 137
- 2020Beat the AI: Investigating Adversarial Human Annotation for Reading Comprehensioncited by 131
- 2022DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Developmentcited by 90
- 2020DynaSent: A Dynamic Benchmark for Sentiment Analysiscited by 63
- 2021Hatemoji: A Test Suite and Adversarially-Generated Dataset for Benchmarking and Detecting Emoji-based Hatecited by 50
- 2023Supporting Human-AI Collaboration in Auditing LLMs with LLMscited by 46
- 2022Handling and Presenting Harmful Text in NLP Researchcited by 43
- 2021Models in the Loop: Aiding Crowdworkers with Generative Annotation Assistantscited by 31
- 2023Assessing Language Model Deployment with Risk Cardscited by 30
- 2022Dynatask: A Framework for Creating Dynamic AI Benchmark Taskscited by 16
- 2019Metrology for AI: From Benchmarks to Instrumentscited by 12
- 2018Crowdsourcing with Fairness, Diversity and Budget Constraintscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024SafetyPrompts: a Systematic Review of Open Datasets for Evaluating and Improving Large Language Model Safetycited by 77
- 2024A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teamingcited by 47
- 2024Harm Amplification in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 15
- 2024STAR: SocioTechnical Approach to Red Teaming Language Modelscited by 13
- 2025Whose View of Safety? A Deep DIVE Dataset for Pluralistic Alignment of Text-to-Image Modelscited by 11
- 2023Distilling Adversarial Prompts from Safety Benchmarks: Report for the Adversarial Nibbler Challengecited by 6
- 2023DataCI: A Platform for Data-Centric AI on Streaming Datacited by 0
- 2025Whose View of Safety? A Deep DIVE Dataset for Pluralistic Alignment of Text-to-Image Models15 Jul 2025
- 2024STAR: SocioTechnical Approach to Red Teaming Language Models17 Jun 2024
- 2024SafetyPrompts: a Systematic Review of Open Datasets for Evaluating and Improving Large Language Model Safety8 Apr 2024
- 2024A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming7 Mar 2024
- 2024Harm Amplification in Text-to-Image Models1 Feb 2024
- 2023Distilling Adversarial Prompts from Safety Benchmarks: Report for the Adversarial Nibbler Challenge20 Sep 2023
- 2023DataCI: A Platform for Data-Centric AI on Streaming Data27 Jun 2023
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Adversarial Nibbler: An Open Red-Teaming Method for Identifying Diverse Harms in Text-to-Image Generation
- 2025GenBreak: Red Teaming Text-to-Image Generators Using Large Language Models
- 2026Safe Image Generation via Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Open Models, Open Risks: Measuring Unsafe Generation in Text-to-Image Models In the Wild
- 2026Low-Effort Jailbreak Attacks Against Text-to-Image Safety Filters
- 2025TokenProber: Jailbreaking Text-to-image Models via Fine-grained Word Impact Analysis
- 2024ART: Automatic Red-teaming for Text-to-Image Models to Protect Benign Users
- 2026DiSCO: Defending text-to-image generation through distribution-guided contrastive prompt optimization