In-Context Probing: Toward Building Robust Classifiers via Probing Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models are able to learn new tasks in context, where they are provided with instructions and a few annotated examples. However, the effectiveness of in-context learning is dependent on the provided context, and the performance on a downstream task can vary considerably, depending on the instruction. Importantly, such dependency on the context can surface in unpredictable ways, e.g., a seemingly more informative instruction might lead to a worse performance. In this paper, we propose an alternative approach, which we term In-Context Probing (ICP). Similar to in-context learning, we contextualize the representation of the input with an instruction, but instead of decoding the output prediction, we probe the contextualized representation to predict the label. Through a series of experiments on a diverse set of classification tasks, we show that in-context probing is significantly more robust to changes in instructions. We further show that ICP performs competitive or superior to finetuning and can be particularly helpful to build classifiers on top of smaller models, with less than a hundred training examples.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2023.
Builds on
24 of 34 references.
References · 24
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
12 more
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,256
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
- 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 872
- 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 530
- 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 460
- 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 417
- 2021Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?cited by 326
- 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 263
- 2019Simple, Scalable Adaptation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 242
- 2021How Many Data Points is a Prompt Worth?cited by 198
- 2020CLIMATE-FEVER: A Dataset for Verification of Real-World Climate Claimscited by 196
- 2020Effective Transfer Learning for Identifying Similar Questions: Matching User Questions to COVID-19 FAQscited by 48
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.