Industry Practices for Challenging Autonomous Driving Systems with Critical Scenarios
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Testing autonomous driving systems for safety and reliability is extremely complex. A primary challenge is identifying the relevant test scenarios, especially the critical ones that may expose hazards or risks of harm to autonomous vehicles and other road users. There are several proposed methods and tools for critical scenario identification, while the industry practices, such as the selection, implementation, and limitations of the approaches, are not well understood. In this study, we conducted 10 interviews with 13 interviewees from 7 companies in autonomous driving in Sweden. We used thematic modeling to analyse and synthesize the interview data. We found there are little joint efforts in the industry to explore different approaches and tools, and every approach has its own limitations and weaknesses. To that end, we recommend combining different approaches available, collaborating among different stakeholders, and continuously learning the field of critical scenario identification and testing. The contributions of our study are the exploration and synthesis of the industry practices and related challenges for critical scenario identification and testing, and the potential increase of the industry relevance for future studies in related topics.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 May 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2025Foundation Models in Autonomous Driving: A Survey on Scenario Generation and Scenario Analysiscited by 38
- 2024SEAL: Towards Safe Autonomous Driving via Skill-Enabled Adversary Learning for Closed-Loop Scenario Generationcited by 10
- 2024Autonomous Driving at Unsignalized Intersections: A Review of Decision-Making Challenges and Reinforcement Learning-Based Solutionscited by 7
- 2025Generative AI for Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems: A Surveycited by 3
- 2025Navigating the Edge with the State-of-the-Art Insights into Corner Case Identification and Generation for Enhanced Autonomous Vehicle Safetycited by 1
- 2025Advancing Autonomous Driving System Testing: Demands, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 1
- 2026PlannerForge: LLM Agents for Scenario-Based Testing of Motion Planners in Autonomous Drivingcited by 1
- 2025CORTEX-AVD: A Framework for CORner Case Testing and EXploration in Autonomous Vehicle Developmentcited by 0
- 2026PlannerForge: LLM Agents for Scenario-Based Testing of Motion Planners in Autonomous Driving8 Sep 2026
- 2025Advancing Autonomous Driving System Testing: Demands, Challenges, and Future Directions9 Dec 2025
- 2025Generative AI for Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems: A Survey27 Aug 2025
- 2025Foundation Models in Autonomous Driving: A Survey on Scenario Generation and Scenario Analysis13 Jun 2025
- 2025CORTEX-AVD: A Framework for CORner Case Testing and EXploration in Autonomous Vehicle Development4 Apr 2025
- 2025Navigating the Edge with the State-of-the-Art Insights into Corner Case Identification and Generation for Enhanced Autonomous Vehicle Safety27 Feb 2025
- 2024Autonomous Driving at Unsignalized Intersections: A Review of Decision-Making Challenges and Reinforcement Learning-Based Solutions20 Sep 2024
- 2024SEAL: Towards Safe Autonomous Driving via Skill-Enabled Adversary Learning for Closed-Loop Scenario Generation16 Sep 2024