Learning Relevant Contextual Variables Within Bayesian Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contextual Bayesian Optimization (CBO) efficiently optimizes black-box functions with respect to design variables, while simultaneously integrating contextual information regarding the environment, such as experimental conditions. However, the relevance of contextual variables is not necessarily known beforehand. Moreover, contextual variables can sometimes be optimized themselves at an additional cost, a setting overlooked by current CBO algorithms. Cost-sensitive CBO would simply include optimizable contextual variables as part of the design variables based on their cost. Instead, we adaptively select a subset of contextual variables to include in the optimization, based on the trade-off between their relevance and the additional cost incurred by optimizing them compared to leaving them to be determined by the environment. We learn the relevance of contextual variables by sensitivity analysis of the posterior surrogate model while minimizing the cost of optimization by leveraging recent developments on early stopping for BO. We empirically evaluate our proposed Sensitivity-Analysis-Driven Contextual BO (SADCBO) method against alternatives on both synthetic and real-world experiments, together with extensive ablation studies, and demonstrate a consistent improvement across examples.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2023.
Builds on
22 of 42 references.
References · 22
- 2016Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of moleculescited by 765
- 2021High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization with Sparse Axis-Aligned Subspacescited by 141
- 2019ChemBO: Bayesian Optimization of Small Organic Molecules with Synthesizable Recommendationscited by 77
- 2019Bayesian Optimization for Materials Design with Mixed Quantitative and Qualitative Variablescited by 66
- 2017The reparameterization trick for acquisition functionscited by 63
- 2018Adversarially Robust Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 62
- 2020Distributionally Robust Bayesian Optimizationcited by 61
- 2018High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Additive Models with Overlapping Groupscited by 59
- 2017Batched High-dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Structural Kernel Learningcited by 51
- 2020Cost-aware Bayesian Optimizationcited by 42
- 2018High Dimensional Bayesian Optimization Using Dropoutcited by 40
- 2020Bayesian Optimization of Risk Measurescited by 36
10 more
- 2023Are Random Decompositions all we need in High Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation?cited by 36
- 2018Bayesian Optimization with Expensive Integrandscited by 24
- 2021Automatic Termination for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 21
- 2021A Nonmyopic Approach to Cost-Constrained Bayesian Optimizationcited by 19
- 2022Distributionally Robust Bayesian Optimization with varphi-divergencescited by 16
- 2014Robust Optimization using Machine Learning for Uncertainty Setscited by 14
- 2022Causal Entropy Optimizationcited by 13
- 2021Computationally Efficient High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Variable Selectioncited by 12
- 2022Sparse Bayesian Optimizationcited by 6
- 2023Contextual Causal Bayesian Optimisationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.