mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MaNtLE: Model-agnostic Natural Language Explainer

arXiv 2305.12995 ↗First posted 22 May 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding the internal reasoning behind the predictions of machine learning systems is increasingly vital, given their rising adoption and acceptance. While previous approaches, such as LIME, generate algorithmic explanations by attributing importance to input features for individual examples, recent research indicates that practitioners prefer examining language explanations that explain sub-groups of examples. In this paper, we introduce MaNtLE, a model-agnostic natural language explainer that analyzes multiple classifier predictions and generates faithful natural language explanations of classifier rationale for structured classification tasks. MaNtLE uses multi-task training on thousands of synthetic classification tasks to generate faithful explanations. Simulated user studies indicate that, on average, MaNtLE-generated explanations are at least 11% more faithful compared to LIME and Anchors explanations across three tasks. Human evaluations demonstrate that users can better predict model behavior using explanations from MaNtLE compared to other techniques

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  6. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  7. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  8. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  9. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  10. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  11. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
  12. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
10 more
  1. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
  2. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  3. 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
  4. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
  5. 2022Instruction Induction: From Few Examples to Natural Language Task Descriptionscited by 152
  6. 2020WT5?! Training Text-to-Text Models to Explain their Predictionscited by 148
  7. 2022Rethinking Explainability as a Dialogue: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 52
  8. 2022Fixing Model Bugs with Natural Language Patchescited by 32
  9. 2022CLUES: A Benchmark for Learning Classifiers using Natural Language Explanationscited by 9
  10. 2022LaSQuE: Improved Zero-Shot Classification from Explanations Through Quantifier Modeling and Curriculum Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.