mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Measure of Explanatory Effectiveness

arXiv 2305.12233 ↗First posted 20 May 2023cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In most conversations about explanation and AI, the recipient of the explanation (the explainee) is suspiciously absent, despite the problem being ultimately communicative in nature. We pose the problem `explaining AI systems' in terms of a two-player cooperative game in which each agent seeks to maximise our proposed measure of explanatory effectiveness. This measure serves as a foundation for the automated assessment of explanations, in terms of the effects that any given action in the game has on the internal state of the explainee.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2023.

Builds on

2 of 38 references.

References · 2

  1. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  2. 2019Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AIcited by 63

Built on by

Not cited yet.