Pseudo-Label Training and Model Inertia in Neural Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Like many other machine learning applications, neural machine translation (NMT) benefits from over-parameterized deep neural models. However, these models have been observed to be brittle: NMT model predictions are sensitive to small input changes and can show significant variation across re-training or incremental model updates. This work studies a frequently used method in NMT, pseudo-label training (PLT), which is common to the related techniques of forward-translation (or self-training) and sequence-level knowledge distillation. While the effect of PLT on quality is well-documented, we highlight a lesser-known effect: PLT can enhance a model's stability to model updates and input perturbations, a set of properties we call model inertia. We study inertia effects under different training settings and we identify distribution simplification as a mechanism behind the observed results.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2023.
Builds on
10 of 69 references.
References · 10
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2022Self-Training: A Surveycited by 85
- 2019Self-Knowledge Distillation in Natural Language Processingcited by 60
- 2017Ensemble Distillation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 39
- 2019On Model Stability as a Function of Random Seedcited by 31
- 2019Findings of the First Shared Task on Machine Translation Robustnesscited by 17
- 2022Measuring and Reducing Model Update Regression in Structured Prediction for NLPcited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.