mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Flexible and Inherently Comprehensible Knowledge Representation for Data-Efficient Learning and Trustworthy Human-Machine Teaming in Manufacturing Environments

arXiv 2305.11597 ↗First posted 19 May 2023cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trustworthiness of artificially intelligent agents is vital for the acceptance of human-machine teaming in industrial manufacturing environments. Predictable behaviours and explainable (and understandable) rationale allow humans collaborating with (and building) these agents to understand their motivations and therefore validate decisions that are made. To that aim, we make use of G"ardenfors's cognitively inspired Conceptual Space framework to represent the agent's knowledge using concepts as convex regions in a space spanned by inherently comprehensible quality dimensions. A simple typicality quantification model is built on top of it to determine fuzzy category membership and classify instances interpretably. We apply it on a use case from the manufacturing domain, using objects' physical properties obtained from cobots' onboard sensors and utilisation properties from crowdsourced commonsense knowledge available at public knowledge bases. Such flexible knowledge representation based on property decomposition allows for data-efficient representation learning of typically highly specialist or specific manufacturing artefacts. In such a setting, traditional data-driven (e.g., computer vision-based) classification approaches would struggle due to training data scarcity. This allows for comprehensibility of an AI agent's acquired knowledge by the human collaborator thus contributing to trustworthiness. We situate our approach within an existing explainability framework specifying explanation desiderata. We provide arguments for our system's applicability and appropriateness for different roles of human agents collaborating with the AI system throughout its design, validation, and operation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2023.

Builds on

10 of 58 references.

References · 10

  1. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  2. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,867
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  4. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  5. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  6. 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,067
  7. 2018Interpretable to Whom? A Role-based Model for Analyzing Interpretable Machine Learning Systemscited by 48
  8. 2018Cognitive computational neurosciencecited by 43
  9. 2017Conceptual Spaces for Cognitive Architectures: A Lingua Franca for Different Levels of Representationcited by 6
  10. 2017A Thorough Formalization of Conceptual Spacescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.