Group fairness without demographics using social networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Group fairness is a popular approach to prevent unfavorable treatment of individuals based on sensitive attributes such as race, gender, and disability. However, the reliance of group fairness on access to discrete group information raises several limitations and concerns, especially with regard to privacy, intersectionality, and unforeseen biases. In this work, we propose a "group-free" measure of fairness that does not rely on sensitive attributes and, instead, is based on homophily in social networks, i.e., the common property that individuals sharing similar attributes are more likely to be connected. Our measure is group-free as it avoids recovering any form of group memberships and uses only pairwise similarities between individuals to define inequality in outcomes relative to the homophily structure in the network. We theoretically justify our measure by showing it is commensurate with the notion of additive decomposability in the economic inequality literature and also bound the impact of non-sensitive confounding attributes. Furthermore, we apply our measure to develop fair algorithms for classification, maximizing information access, and recommender systems. Our experimental results show that the proposed approach can reduce inequality among protected classes without knowledge of sensitive attribute labels. We conclude with a discussion of the limitations of our approach when applied in real-world settings.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 May 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Fairness without Sensitive Attributes via Knowledge Sharingcited by 6
- 2023Group-blind optimal transport to group parity and its constrained variantscited by 4
- 2024Learning With Multi-Group Guarantees For Clusterable Subpopulationscited by 3
- 2025Do You Trust the Process?: Modeling Institutional Trust for Community Adoption of Reinforcement Learning Policiescited by 0
- 2025Do You Trust the Process?: Modeling Institutional Trust for Community Adoption of Reinforcement Learning Policies24 Oct 2025
- 2024Learning With Multi-Group Guarantees For Clusterable Subpopulations18 Oct 2024
- 2024Fairness without Sensitive Attributes via Knowledge Sharing27 Sep 2024
- 2023Group-blind optimal transport to group parity and its constrained variants17 Oct 2023