RobustFair: Adversarial Evaluation through Fairness Confusion Directed Gradient Search
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks (DNNs) often face challenges due to their vulnerability to various adversarial perturbations, including false perturbations that undermine prediction accuracy and biased perturbations that cause biased predictions for similar inputs. This paper introduces a novel approach, RobustFair, to evaluate the accurate fairness of DNNs when subjected to these false or biased perturbations. RobustFair employs the notion of the fairness confusion matrix induced in accurate fairness to identify the crucial input features for perturbations. This matrix categorizes predictions as true fair, true biased, false fair, and false biased, and the perturbations guided by it can produce a dual impact on instances and their similar counterparts to either undermine prediction accuracy (robustness) or cause biased predictions (individual fairness). RobustFair then infers the ground truth of these generated adversarial instances based on their loss function values approximated by the total derivative. To leverage the generated instances for trustworthiness improvement, RobustFair further proposes a data augmentation strategy to prioritize adversarial instances resembling the original training set, for data augmentation and model retraining. Notably, RobustFair excels at detecting intertwined issues of robustness and individual fairness, which are frequently overlooked in standard robustness and individual fairness evaluations. This capability empowers RobustFair to enhance both robustness and individual fairness evaluations by concurrently identifying defects in either domain. Empirical case studies and quantile regression analyses on benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the fairness confusion matrix guided perturbation for false or biased adversarial instance generation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2023.
Builds on
8 of 27 references.
References · 8
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2021Testing Group Fairness via Optimal Transport Projectionscited by 23
- 2022Accurate Fairness: Improving Individual Fairness without Trading Accuracycited by 16
- 2021Automatic Fairness Testing of Neural Classifiers through Adversarial Samplingcited by 14
- 2022Diversified Adversarial Attacks based on Conjugate Gradient Methodcited by 11
- 2022Error Parity Fairness: Testing for Group Fairness in Regression Taskscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.