mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

BAD: BiAs Detection for Large Language Models in the context of candidate screening

arXiv 2305.10407 ↗First posted 17 May 2023cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Application Tracking Systems (ATS) have allowed talent managers, recruiters, and college admissions committees to process large volumes of potential candidate applications efficiently. Traditionally, this screening process was conducted manually, creating major bottlenecks due to the quantity of applications and introducing many instances of human bias. The advent of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and the potential of adopting methods to current automated application screening raises additional bias and fairness issues that must be addressed. In this project, we wish to identify and quantify the instances of social bias in ChatGPT and other OpenAI LLMs in the context of candidate screening in order to demonstrate how the use of these models could perpetuate existing biases and inequalities in the hiring process.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 May 2023.

Builds on

3 of 18 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 918
  2. 2023LLaMA-Adapter: Efficient Fine-tuning of Language Models with Zero-init Attentioncited by 778
  3. 2023A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failurescited by 168

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

8 papers.