mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Faster Federated Learning with Decaying Number of Local SGD Steps

arXiv 2305.09628 ↗First posted 16 May 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In Federated Learning (FL) client devices connected over the internet collaboratively train a machine learning model without sharing their private data with a central server or with other clients. The seminal Federated Averaging (FedAvg) algorithm trains a single global model by performing rounds of local training on clients followed by model averaging. FedAvg can improve the communication-efficiency of training by performing more steps of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) on clients in each round. However, client data in real-world FL is highly heterogeneous, which has been extensively shown to slow model convergence and harm final performance when K > 1 steps of SGD are performed on clients per round. In this work we propose decaying K as training progresses, which can jointly improve the final performance of the FL model whilst reducing the wall-clock time and the total computational cost of training compared to using a fixed K. We analyse the convergence of FedAvg with decaying K for strongly-convex objectives, providing novel insights into the convergence properties, and derive three theoretically-motivated decay schedules for K. We then perform thorough experiments on four benchmark FL datasets (FEMNIST, CIFAR100, Sentiment140, Shakespeare) to show the real-world benefit of our approaches in terms of real-world convergence time, computational cost, and generalisation performance.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2023.

Builds on

19 of 29 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  4. 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
  5. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
  6. 2019Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Designcited by 826
  7. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
  8. 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 565
  9. 2018Don't Use Large Mini-Batches, Use Local SGDcited by 201
  10. 2021Achieving Linear Speedup with Partial Worker Participation in Non-IID Federated Learningcited by 192
  11. 2020Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?cited by 151
  12. 2018Federated Learning for Keyword Spottingcited by 95
7 more
  1. 2019Federated Learning over Wireless Networks: Convergence Analysis and Resource Allocationcited by 93
  2. 2018Adaptive Communication Strategies to Achieve the Best Error-Runtime Trade-off in Local-Update SGDcited by 76
  3. 2020From Local SGD to Local Fixed-Point Methods for Federated Learningcited by 74
  4. 2021Convergence and Accuracy Trade-Offs in Federated Learning and Meta-Learningcited by 52
  5. 2019Proof of Federated Learning: A Novel Energy-recycling Consensus Algorithmcited by 26
  6. 2020Extrapolation for Large-batch Training in Deep Learningcited by 25
  7. 2020Towards Efficient Scheduling of Federated Mobile Devices under Computational and Statistical Heterogeneitycited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

4 papers.