mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Better Contrastive View from Radiologist's Gaze

arXiv 2305.08826 ↗First posted 15 May 2023cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent self-supervised contrastive learning methods greatly benefit from the Siamese structure that aims to minimizing distances between positive pairs. These methods usually apply random data augmentation to input images, expecting the augmented views of the same images to be similar and positively paired. However, random augmentation may overlook image semantic information and degrade the quality of augmented views in contrastive learning. This issue becomes more challenging in medical images since the abnormalities related to diseases can be tiny, and are easy to be corrupted (e.g., being cropped out) in the current scheme of random augmentation. In this work, we first demonstrate that, for widely-used X-ray images, the conventional augmentation prevalent in contrastive pre-training can affect the performance of the downstream diagnosis or classification tasks. Then, we propose a novel augmentation method, i.e., FocusContrast, to learn from radiologists' gaze in diagnosis and generate contrastive views for medical images with guidance from radiologists' visual attention. Specifically, we track the gaze movement of radiologists and model their visual attention when reading to diagnose X-ray images. The learned model can predict visual attention of the radiologists given a new input image, and further guide the attention-aware augmentation that hardly neglects the disease-related abnormalities. As a plug-and-play and framework-agnostic module, FocusContrast consistently improves state-of-the-art contrastive learning methods of SimCLR, MoCo, and BYOL by 4.0~7.0% in classification accuracy on a knee X-ray dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2023.

Builds on

35 of 51 references.

References · 35

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  4. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  5. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  6. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  7. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  8. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  9. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  10. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  11. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  12. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
23 more
  1. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  2. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  3. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  4. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,168
  5. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  6. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  7. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
  8. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
  9. 2019On Variational Bounds of Mutual Informationcited by 550
  10. 2021Big Self-Supervised Models Advance Medical Image Classificationcited by 320
  11. 2020What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learningcited by 224
  12. 2022Patches Are All You Need?cited by 201
  13. 2017Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noisecited by 164
  14. 2019Pyramid Feature Attention Network for Saliency detectioncited by 128
  15. 2020Comparing to Learn: Surpassing ImageNet Pretraining on Radiographs By Comparing Image Representationscited by 69
  16. 2022Pushing the limits of self-supervised ResNets: Can we outperform supervised learning without labels on ImageNet?cited by 67
  17. 2022Crafting Better Contrastive Views for Siamese Representation Learningcited by 67
  18. 2021Equivariant Contrastive Learningcited by 65
  19. 2020CASTing Your Model: Learning to Localize Improves Self-Supervised Representationscited by 63
  20. 2020MoCo-CXR: MoCo Pretraining Improves Representation and Transferability of Chest X-ray Modelscited by 61
  21. 2022Follow My Eye: Using Gaze to Supervise Computer-Aided Diagnosiscited by 38
  22. 2016Gaze Embeddings for Zero-Shot Image Classificationcited by 25
  23. 2021Domain Generalization for Mammography Detection via Multi-style and Multi-view Contrastive Learningcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

4 papers.