Topological Interpretability for Deep-Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the growing adoption of AI-based systems across everyday life, the need to understand their decision-making mechanisms is correspondingly increasing. The level at which we can trust the statistical inferences made from AI-based decision systems is an increasing concern, especially in high-risk systems such as criminal justice or medical diagnosis, where incorrect inferences may have tragic consequences. Despite their successes in providing solutions to problems involving real-world data, deep learning (DL) models cannot quantify the certainty of their predictions. These models are frequently quite confident, even when their solutions are incorrect. This work presents a method to infer prominent features in two DL classification models trained on clinical and non-clinical text by employing techniques from topological and geometric data analysis. We create a graph of a model's feature space and cluster the inputs into the graph's vertices by the similarity of features and prediction statistics. We then extract subgraphs demonstrating high-predictive accuracy for a given label. These subgraphs contain a wealth of information about features that the DL model has recognized as relevant to its decisions. We infer these features for a given label using a distance metric between probability measures, and demonstrate the stability of our method compared to the LIME and SHAP interpretability methods. This work establishes that we may gain insights into the decision mechanism of a DL model. This method allows us to ascertain if the model is making its decisions based on information germane to the problem or identifies extraneous patterns within the data.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2023.
Builds on
15 of 46 references.
References · 15
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
- 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
- 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 310
- 2019The Dangers of Post-hoc Interpretability: Unjustified Counterfactual Explanationscited by 97
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.