Label Smoothing is Robustification against Model Misspecification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Label smoothing (LS) adopts smoothed targets in classification tasks. For example, in binary classification, instead of the one-hot target (1,0)^top used in conventional logistic regression (LR), LR with LS (LSLR) uses the smoothed target (1-fracα2,fracα2)^top with a smoothing level α∈(0,1), which causes squeezing of values of the logit. Apart from the common regularization-based interpretation of LS that leads to an inconsistent probability estimator, we regard LSLR as modifying the loss function and consistent estimator for probability estimation. In order to study the significance of each of these two modifications by LSLR, we introduce a modified LSLR (MLSLR) that uses the same loss function as LSLR and the same consistent estimator as LR, while not squeezing the logits. For the loss function modification, we theoretically show that MLSLR with a larger smoothing level has lower efficiency with correctly-specified models, while it exhibits higher robustness against model misspecification than LR. Also, for the modification of the probability estimator, an experimental comparison between LSLR and MLSLR showed that this modification and squeezing of the logits in LSLR have negative effects on the probability estimation and classification performance. The understanding of the properties of LS provided by these comparisons allows us to propose MLSLR as an improvement over LSLR.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2023.
Builds on
16 of 42 references.
References · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,101
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
- 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
- 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
- 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
- 2016Towards better decoding and language model integration in sequence to sequence modelscited by 100
- 2015Distributional Smoothing with Virtual Adversarial Trainingcited by 61
- 2020Generalized Entropy Regularization or: There's Nothing Special about Label Smoothingcited by 41
- 2018Evaluating and Understanding the Robustness of Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 34
4 more
- 2020Regularization via Structural Label Smoothingcited by 29
- 2020Towards Understanding Label Smoothingcited by 17
- 2020Cost-Sensitive Regularization for Diabetic Retinopathy Grading from Eye Fundus Imagescited by 10
- 2019Adversarial Robustness via Label-Smoothingcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.