mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Blockchain Transaction Fee Forecasting: A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods

arXiv 2305.08105 ↗First posted 14 May 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gas is the transaction-fee metering system of the Ethereum network. Users of the network are required to select a gas price for submission with their transaction, creating a risk of overpaying or delayed/unprocessed transactions in this selection. In this work, we investigate data in the aftermath of the London Hard Fork and shed insight into the transaction dynamics of the net-work after this major fork. As such, this paper provides an update on work previous to 2019 on the link between EthUSD BitUSD and gas price. For forecasting, we compare a novel combination of machine learning methods such as Direct Recursive Hybrid LSTM, CNNLSTM, and Attention LSTM. These are combined with wavelet threshold denoising and matrix profile data processing toward the forecasting of block minimum gas price, on a 5-min timescale, over multiple lookaheads. As the first application of the matrix profile being applied to gas price data and forecasting we are aware of, this study demonstrates that matrix profile data can enhance attention-based models however, given the hardware constraints, hybrid models outperformed attention and CNNLSTM models. The wavelet coherence of inputs demonstrates correlation in multiple variables on a 1 day timescale, which is a deviation of base free from gas price. A Direct-Recursive Hybrid LSTM strategy outperforms other models. Hybrid models have favourable performance up to a 20 min lookahead with performance being comparable to attention models when forecasting 25/50-min ahead. Forecasts over a range of lookaheads allow users to make an informed decision on gas price selection and the optimal window to submit their transaction in without fear of their transaction being rejected. This, in turn, gives more detailed insight into gas price dynamics than existing recommenders, oracles and forecasting approaches, which provide simple heuristics or limited lookahead horizons.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2023.

Builds on

9 of 52 references.

References · 9

  1. 2020Informer: Beyond Efficient Transformer for Long Sequence Time-Series Forecastingcited by 2,169
  2. 2017DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networkscited by 1,013
  3. 2021Evaluation of deep learning models for multi-step ahead time series predictioncited by 25
  4. 2022Empirical Analysis of EIP-1559: Transaction Fees, Waiting Time, and Consensus Securitycited by 6
  5. 2021Transaction Fee Mechanism Designcited by 5
  6. 2020A Study of Blockchain Oraclescited by 3
  7. 2021Transaction Fees on a Honeymoon: Ethereum's EIP-1559 One Month Latercited by 2
  8. 2020Step on the Gas? A Better Approach for Recommending the Ethereum Gas Pricecited by 1
  9. 2023A Practical and Economical Bayesian Approach to Gas Price Predictioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.