Bridging History with AI A Comparative Evaluation of GPT 3.5, GPT4, and GoogleBARD in Predictive Accuracy and Fact Checking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid proliferation of information in the digital era underscores the importance of accurate historical representation and interpretation. While artificial intelligence has shown promise in various fields, its potential for historical fact-checking and gap-filling remains largely untapped. This study evaluates the performance of three large language models LLMs GPT 3.5, GPT 4, and GoogleBARD in the context of predicting and verifying historical events based on given data. A novel metric, Distance to Reality (DTR), is introduced to assess the models' outputs against established historical facts. The results reveal a substantial potential for AI in historical studies, with GPT 4 demonstrating superior performance. This paper underscores the need for further research into AI's role in enriching our understanding of the past and bridging historical knowledge gaps.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2023.
Builds on
2 of 12 references.
References · 2
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2020Event Prediction in the Big Data Era: A Systematic Surveycited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.