Active Learning For Contextual Linear Optimization: A Margin-Based Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We develop the first active learning method for contextual linear optimization. Specifically, we introduce a label acquisition algorithm that sequentially decides whether to request the ``labels'' of feature samples from an unlabeled data stream, where the labels correspond to the coefficients of the objective in the linear optimization. Our method is the first to be directly informed by the decision loss induced by the predicted coefficients, referred to as the Smart Predict-then-Optimize (SPO) loss. Motivated by the structure of the SPO loss, our algorithm adopts a margin-based criterion utilizing the concept of distance to degeneracy. In particular, we design an efficient active learning algorithm with theoretical excess risk (i.e., generalization) guarantees. We derive upper bounds on the label complexity, defined as the number of samples whose labels are acquired to achieve a desired small level of SPO risk. These bounds show that our algorithm has a much smaller label complexity than the naive supervised learning approach that labels all samples, particularly when the SPO loss is minimized directly on the collected data. To address the discontinuity and nonconvexity of the SPO loss, we derive label complexity bounds under tractable surrogate loss functions. Under natural margin conditions, these bounds also outperform naive supervised learning. Using the SPO+ loss, a specialized surrogate of the SPO loss, we establish even tighter bounds under separability conditions. Finally, we present numerical evidence showing the practical value of our algorithms in settings such as personalized pricing and the shortest path problem.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 May 2023.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023Decision-Focused Learning: Foundations, State of the Art, Benchmark and Future Opportunitiescited by 130
- 2023A Survey of Contextual Optimization Methods for Decision Making under Uncertaintycited by 82
- 2023TaskMet: Task-Driven Metric Learning for Model Learningcited by 11
- 2025Decision-Focused Bias Correction for Fluid Approximationcited by 3
- 2024What is the Right Notion of Distance between Predict-then-Optimize Tasks?cited by 2
- 2026Learning Decision-Sufficient Representations for Linear Optimizationcited by 1
- 2026Weak-to-Strong Learning in Decision Makingcited by 0
- 2026Weak-to-Strong Learning in Decision Making20 Jul 2026
- 2026Learning Decision-Sufficient Representations for Linear Optimization19 Mar 2026
- 2025Decision-Focused Bias Correction for Fluid Approximation4 Dec 2025
- 2024What is the Right Notion of Distance between Predict-then-Optimize Tasks?11 Sep 2024
- 2023TaskMet: Task-Driven Metric Learning for Model Learning8 Dec 2023
- 2023Decision-Focused Learning: Foundations, State of the Art, Benchmark and Future Opportunities25 Jul 2023
- 2023A Survey of Contextual Optimization Methods for Decision Making under Uncertainty17 Jun 2023