mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rudolf Christoph Eucken at SemEval-2023 Task 4: An Ensemble Approach for Identifying Human Values from Arguments

arXiv 2305.05335 ↗First posted 9 May 2023cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The subtle human values we acquire through life experiences govern our thoughts and gets reflected in our speech. It plays an integral part in capturing the essence of our individuality and making it imperative to identify such values in computational systems that mimic human actions. Computational argumentation is a field that deals with the argumentation capabilities of humans and can benefit from identifying such values. Motivated by that, we present an ensemble approach for detecting human values from argument text. Our ensemble comprises three models: (i) An entailment-based model for determining the human values based on their descriptions, (ii) A Roberta-based classifier that predicts the set of human values from an argument. (iii) A Roberta-based classifier to predict a reduced set of human values from an argument. We experiment with different ways of combining the models and report our results. Furthermore, our best combination achieves an overall F1 score of 0.48 on the main test set.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2023.

Builds on

3 of 9 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  2. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  3. 2023The Touch'e23-ValueEval Dataset for Identifying Human Values behind Argumentscited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.