Signal vs Noise in Eye-tracking Data: Biometric Implications and Identity Information Across Frequencies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prior research states that frequencies below 75 Hz in eye-tracking data represent the primary eye movement termed ``signal'' while those above 75 Hz are deemed ``noise''. This study examines the biometric significance of this signal-noise distinction and its privacy implications. There are important individual differences in a person's eye movement, which lead to reliable biometric performance in the ``signal'' part. Despite minimal eye-movement information in the ``noise'' recordings, there might be significant individual differences. Our results confirm the ``signal'' predominantly contains identity-specific information, yet the ``noise'' also possesses unexpected identity-specific data. This consistency holds for both short-(approx. 20 min) and long-term (approx. 1 year) biometric evaluations. Understanding the location of identity data within the eye movement spectrum is essential for privacy preservation.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 May 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.
- 2024Temporal Persistence and Intercorrelation of Embeddings Learned by an End-to-End Deep Learning Eye Movement-driven Biometrics Pipelinecited by 2
- 2025Ocular Authentication: Fusion of Gaze and Periocular Modalitiescited by 2
- 2025Gaze Authentication: Factors Influencing Authentication Performancecited by 0
- 2025Gaze Authentication: Factors Influencing Authentication Performance13 Sep 2025
- 2025Ocular Authentication: Fusion of Gaze and Periocular Modalities22 May 2025
- 2024Temporal Persistence and Intercorrelation of Embeddings Learned by an End-to-End Deep Learning Eye Movement-driven Biometrics Pipeline26 Feb 2024