mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Signal vs Noise in Eye-tracking Data: Biometric Implications and Identity Information Across Frequencies

arXiv 2305.04413 ↗First posted 8 May 2023cs.HCcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prior research states that frequencies below 75 Hz in eye-tracking data represent the primary eye movement termed ``signal'' while those above 75 Hz are deemed ``noise''. This study examines the biometric significance of this signal-noise distinction and its privacy implications. There are important individual differences in a person's eye movement, which lead to reliable biometric performance in the ``signal'' part. Despite minimal eye-movement information in the ``noise'' recordings, there might be significant individual differences. Our results confirm the ``signal'' predominantly contains identity-specific information, yet the ``noise'' also possesses unexpected identity-specific data. This consistency holds for both short-(approx. 20 min) and long-term (approx. 1 year) biometric evaluations. Understanding the location of identity data within the eye movement spectrum is essential for privacy preservation.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 May 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.