mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Maintaining Stability and Plasticity for Predictive Churn Reduction

arXiv 2305.04135 ↗First posted 6 May 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deployed machine learning models should be updated to take advantage of a larger sample size to improve performance, as more data is gathered over time. Unfortunately, even when model updates improve aggregate metrics such as accuracy, they can lead to errors on samples that were correctly predicted by the previous model causing per-sample regression in performance known as predictive churn. Such prediction flips erode user trust thereby reducing the effectiveness of the human-AI team as a whole. We propose a solution called Accumulated Model Combination (AMC) based keeping the previous and current model version, and generating a meta-output using the prediction of the two models. AMC is a general technique and we propose several instances of it, each having their own advantages depending on the model and data properties. AMC requires minimal additional computation and changes to training procedures. We motivate the need for AMC by showing the difficulty of making a single model consistent with its own predictions throughout training thereby revealing an implicit stability-plasticity tradeoff when training a single model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of AMC on a variety of modalities including computer vision, text, and tabular datasets comparing against state-of-the-art churn reduction methods, and showing superior churn reduction ability compared to all existing methods while being more efficient than ensembles.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2023.

Builds on

25 of 41 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  4. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  5. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  6. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  7. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,299
  8. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
  9. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 678
  10. 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 600
  11. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 422
  12. 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 399
13 more
  1. 2021On the Importance of Gradients for Detecting Distributional Shifts in the Wildcited by 339
  2. 2019PyHessian: Neural Networks Through the Lens of the Hessiancited by 292
  3. 2019SGD on Neural Networks Learns Functions of Increasing Complexitycited by 204
  4. 2018Large scale distributed neural network training through online distillationcited by 146
  5. 2019FairFace: Face Attribute Dataset for Balanced Race, Gender, and Agecited by 87
  6. 2020The Surprising Simplicity of the Early-Time Learning Dynamics of Neural Networkscited by 58
  7. 2020Positive-Congruent Training: Towards Regression-Free Model Updatescited by 57
  8. 2020An Empirical Analysis of Backward Compatibility in Machine Learning Systemscited by 38
  9. 2022Characterizing Datapoints via Second-Split Forgettingcited by 37
  10. 2021On the Reproducibility of Neural Network Predictionscited by 29
  11. 2021Churn Reduction via Distillationcited by 17
  12. 2022Measuring and Reducing Model Update Regression in Structured Prediction for NLPcited by 11
  13. 2022ELODI: Ensemble Logit Difference Inhibition for Positive-Congruent Trainingcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.