mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

High-pass filtered fidelity-imposed network edit (HP-FINE) for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping from high-pass filtered phase

arXiv 2305.03844 ↗First posted 5 May 2023eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Purpose: To improve the generalization ability of deep learning based predictions of quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) from high-pass filtered phase (HPFP) data. Methods: A network fine-tuning step called HP-FINE is proposed, which is based on the high-pass filtering forward model with low-frequency preservation regularization. Several comparisons were conducted: 1. HP-FINE with and without low-frequency regularization, 2. three 3D network architectures (Unet, Progressive Unet, and Big Unet), 3. two types of network output (recovered field and susceptibility), and 4. pre-training with and without the filtering augmentation. HPFP datasets with diverse high-pass filters, another acquisition voxel size, and prospective acquisition were used to assess the accuracy of QSM predictions. In the retrospective datasets, quantitative metrics (PSNR, SSIM, RMSE and HFEN) were used for evaluation. In the prospective dataset, statistics of ROI linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis were used for evaluation. Results: In the retrospective datasets, adding low-frequency regularization in HP-FINE substantially improved prediction accuracy compared to the pre-trained results, especially when combined with the filtering augmentation and recovered field output. In the prospective datasets, HP-FINE with low-frequency regularization and recovered field output demonstrated the preservation of ROI values, a result that was not achieved when using susceptibility as the output. Furthermore, Progressive Unet pre-trained with a combination of multiple losses outperformed both Unet and Progressive Unet pre-trained with a single loss in terms of preserving ROI values.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2023.

Builds on

14 of 34 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  3. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,476
  4. 2018Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping using Deep Neural Network: QSMnetcited by 24
  5. 2019Fidelity Imposed Network Edit (FINE) for Solving Ill-Posed Image Reconstructioncited by 16
  6. 2020Learned Proximal Networks for Quantitative Susceptibility Mappingcited by 10
  7. 2020Efficient Folded Attention for 3D Medical Image Reconstruction and Segmentationcited by 9
  8. 2021MoDL-QSM: Model-based Deep Learning for Quantitative Susceptibility Mappingcited by 8
  9. 2021Accelerating Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping using Compressed Sensing and Deep Neural Networkcited by 8
  10. 2022LARO: Learned Acquisition and Reconstruction Optimization to accelerate Quantitative Susceptibility Mappingcited by 6
  11. 2020Bayesian Learning of Probabilistic Dipole Inversion for Quantitative Susceptibility Mappingcited by 4
  12. 2021Temporal Feature Fusion with Sampling Pattern Optimization for Multi-echo Gradient Echo Acquisition and Image Reconstructioncited by 4
2 more
  1. 2020Probabilistic Dipole Inversion for Adaptive Quantitative Susceptibility Mappingcited by 3
  2. 2020Reconstruction of Quantitative Susceptibility Maps from Phase of Susceptibility Weighted Imaging with Cross-Connected Psi-Netcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.