Zelda: Video Analytics using Vision-Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Advances in ML have motivated the design of video analytics systems that allow for structured queries over video datasets. However, existing systems limit query expressivity, require users to specify an ML model per predicate, rely on complex optimizations that trade off accuracy for performance, and return large amounts of redundant and low-quality results. This paper focuses on the recently developed Vision-Language Models (VLMs) that allow users to query images using natural language like "cars during daytime at traffic intersections." Through an in-depth analysis, we show VLMs address three limitations of current video analytics systems: general expressivity, a single general purpose model to query many predicates, and are both simple and fast. However, VLMs still return large numbers of redundant and low-quality results that can overwhelm and burden users. In addition, VLMs often require manual prompt engineering to improve result relevance. We present Zelda: a video analytics system that uses VLMs to return both relevant and semantically diverse results for top-K queries on large video datasets. Zelda prompts the VLM with the user's query in natural language. Zelda then automatically adds discriminator and synonym terms to boost accuracy, and terms to identify low-quality frames. To improve result diversity, Zelda uses semantic-rich VLM embeddings in an algorithm that prunes similar frames while considering their relevance to the query and the number of top-K results requested. We evaluate Zelda across five datasets and 19 queries and quantitatively show it achieves higher mean average precision (up to 1.15x) and improves average pairwise similarity (up to 1.16x) compared to using VLMs out-of-the-box. We also compare Zelda to a state-of-the-art video analytics engine and show that Zelda retrieves results 7.5x (up to 10.4x) faster for the same accuracy and frame diversity.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 May 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023Vision Language Models in Autonomous Driving: A Survey and Outlookcited by 126
- 2023Prospective Role of Foundation Models in Advancing Autonomous Vehiclescited by 7
- 2024Radar Spectra-Language Model for Automotive Scene Parsingcited by 6
- 2025LazyVLM: Neuro-Symbolic Approach to Video Analyticscited by 1
- 2025Approximate Diverse k-nearest Neighbor Search in Vector Databasecited by 0
- 2026Visual Timelines of Police Encounters in Body-Worn Camera Footage: Operational Context and Activity Cataloging for Training and Analysis in OpenBWCcited by 0
- 2026Visual Timelines of Police Encounters in Body-Worn Camera Footage: Operational Context and Activity Cataloging for Training and Analysis in OpenBWC16 May 2026
- 2025Approximate Diverse k-nearest Neighbor Search in Vector Database31 Oct 2025
- 2025LazyVLM: Neuro-Symbolic Approach to Video Analytics27 May 2025
- 2024Radar Spectra-Language Model for Automotive Scene Parsing4 Jun 2024
- 2023Prospective Role of Foundation Models in Advancing Autonomous Vehicles8 Dec 2023
- 2023Vision Language Models in Autonomous Driving: A Survey and Outlook22 Oct 2023