Simulating H.P. Lovecraft horror literature with the ChatGPT large language model
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we present a novel approach to simulating H.P. Lovecraft's horror literature using the ChatGPT large language model, specifically the GPT-4 architecture. Our study aims to generate text that emulates Lovecraft's unique writing style and themes, while also examining the effectiveness of prompt engineering techniques in guiding the model's output. To achieve this, we curated a prompt containing several specialized literature references and employed advanced prompt engineering methods. We conducted an empirical evaluation of the generated text by administering a survey to a sample of undergraduate students. Utilizing statistical hypothesis testing, we assessed the students ability to distinguish between genuine Lovecraft works and those generated by our model. Our findings demonstrate that the participants were unable to reliably differentiate between the two, indicating the effectiveness of the GPT-4 model and our prompt engineering techniques in emulating Lovecraft's literary style. In addition to presenting the GPT model's capabilities, this paper provides a comprehensive description of its underlying architecture and offers a comparative analysis with related work that simulates other notable authors and philosophers, such as Dennett. By exploring the potential of large language models in the context of literary emulation, our study contributes to the body of research on the applications and limitations of these models in various creative domains.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2023.
Builds on
9 of 71 references.
References · 9
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2023Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPTcited by 320
- 2023ChatGPT is not all you need. A State of the Art Review of large Generative AI modelscited by 85
- 2023ChatGPT: More than a Weapon of Mass Deception, Ethical challenges and responses from the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) perspectivecited by 22
- 2023How Does In-Context Learning Help Prompt Tuning?cited by 11
- 2022Do Artificial Intelligence Systems Understand?cited by 4
- 2022On the independence between phenomenal consciousness and computational intelligencecited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.
3 papers.