mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neuro-symbolic model for cantilever beams damage detection

arXiv 2305.03063 ↗First posted 4 May 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the last decade, damage detection approaches swiftly changed from advanced signal processing methods to machine learning and especially deep learning models, to accurately and non-intrusively estimate the state of the beam structures. But as the deep learning models reached their peak performances, also their limitations in applicability and vulnerabilities were observed. One of the most important reason for the lack of trustworthiness in operational conditions is the absence of intrinsic explainability of the deep learning system, due to the encoding of the knowledge in tensor values and without the inclusion of logical constraints. In this paper, we propose a neuro-symbolic model for the detection of damages in cantilever beams based on a novel cognitive architecture in which we join the processing power of convolutional networks with the interactive control offered by queries realized through the inclusion of real logic directly into the model. The hybrid discriminative model is introduced under the name Logic Convolutional Neural Regressor and it is tested on a dataset of values of the relative natural frequency shifts of cantilever beams derived from an original mathematical relation. While the obtained results preserve all the predictive capabilities of deep learning models, the usage of three distances as predicates for satisfiability, makes the system more trustworthy and scalable for practical applications. Extensive numerical and laboratory experiments were performed, and they all demonstrated the superiority of the hybrid approach, which can open a new path for solving the damage detection problem.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2023.

Builds on

7 of 37 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
  2. 2018Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisalcited by 214
  3. 2020Logic Tensor Networkscited by 197
  4. 2017Logic Tensor Networks for Semantic Image Interpretationcited by 92
  5. 2016Learning Physical Intuition of Block Towers by Examplecited by 66
  6. 2020A Review of Vibration-Based Damage Detection in Civil Structures: From Traditional Methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applicationscited by 33
  7. 2013Can recursive neural tensor networks learn logical reasoning?cited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.

3 papers.