Triangle Counting with Local Edge Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many deployments of differential privacy in industry are in the local model, where each party releases its private information via a differentially private randomizer. We study triangle counting in the local model with edge differential privacy (that, intuitively, requires that the outputs of the algorithm on graphs that differ in one edge be indistinguishable). In this model, each party's local view consists of the adjacency list of one vertex. We investigate both noninteractive and interactive variants of the model. In the noninteractive model, we prove that additive Omega(n2) error is necessary for sufficiently small constant varepsilon, where n is the number of nodes and varepsilon is the privacy parameter. This lower bound is our main technical contribution. It uses a reconstruction attack with a new class of linear queries and a novel mix-and-match strategy of running the local randomizers with different completions of their adjacency lists. It matches the additive error of the algorithm based on Randomized Response, proposed by Imola, Murakami and Chaudhuri (USENIX2021) and analyzed by Imola, Murakami and Chaudhuri (CCS2022) for constant varepsilon. We use a different postprocessing of Randomized Response and provide tight bounds on the variance of the resulting algorithm. In the interactive setting, we prove a lower bound of Omega(n3/2/varepsilon) on the additive error for varepsilon≤ 1. Previously, no hardness results were known for interactive, edge-private algorithms in the local model, except for those that follow trivially from the results for the central model. Our work significantly improves on the state of the art in differentially private graph analysis in the local model.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 May 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Differentially Private Synthetic Graphs Preserving Triangle-Motif Cutscited by 1
- 2023Communication Cost Reduction for Subgraph Counting under Local Differential Privacy via Hash Functionscited by 0
- 2025Signal Recovery from Random Dot-Product Graphs Under Local Differential Privacycited by 0
- 2026Differentially Private Range Subgraph Countingcited by 0
- 2026Differentially Private Range Subgraph Counting6 Jun 2026
- 2025Differentially Private Synthetic Graphs Preserving Triangle-Motif Cuts20 Jul 2025
- 2025Signal Recovery from Random Dot-Product Graphs Under Local Differential Privacy24 Apr 2025
- 2023Communication Cost Reduction for Subgraph Counting under Local Differential Privacy via Hash Functions12 Dec 2023