Learnability with Time-Sharing Computational Resource Concerns
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Conventional theoretical machine learning studies generally assume explicitly or implicitly that there are enough or even infinitely supplied computational resources. In real practice, however, computational resources are usually limited, and the performance of machine learning depends not only on how many data have been received, but also on how many data can be handled subject to computational resources available. Note that most current ``intelligent supercomputing'' facilities work like exclusive operating systems, where a fixed amount of resources are allocated to a machine learning task without adaptive scheduling strategies considering important factors such as the learning performance demands and learning process status. In this article, we introduce the notion of machine learning throughput, define Computational Resource Efficient Learning (CoRE-Learning), and present a theoretical framework that takes into account the influence of computational resources in learning theory. This framework can be naturally applied to stream learning where the incoming data streams can be potentially endless with overwhelming size and it is impractical to assume that all received data can be handled in time. It may also provide a theoretical perspective for the design of intelligent supercomputing operating systems.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2023.
Builds on
1 of 7 references.
References · 1
- 2022Open-environment Machine Learningcited by 48
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2025Representation Learning for Tabular Data: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 36
- 2024Gradient-Variation Online Learning under Generalized Smoothnesscited by 11
- 2024Generating Chain-of-Thoughts with a Pairwise-Comparison Approach to Searching for the Most Promising Intermediate Thoughtcited by 5
- 2024Revisiting Matrix Sketching in Linear Bandits: Achieving Sublinear Regret via Dyadic Block Sketchingcited by 4
- 2024Optimal Matrix Sketching over Sliding Windowscited by 3
- 2023COURIER: Contrastive User Intention Reconstruction for Large-Scale Visual Recommendationcited by 2
- 2023Harnessing Scalable Transactional Stream Processing for Managing Large Language Models [Vision]cited by 0
- 2025Representation Learning for Tabular Data: A Comprehensive Survey17 Apr 2025
- 2024Revisiting Matrix Sketching in Linear Bandits: Achieving Sublinear Regret via Dyadic Block Sketching14 Oct 2024
- 2024Gradient-Variation Online Learning under Generalized Smoothness17 Aug 2024
- 2024Optimal Matrix Sketching over Sliding Windows13 May 2024
- 2024Generating Chain-of-Thoughts with a Pairwise-Comparison Approach to Searching for the Most Promising Intermediate Thought10 Feb 2024
- 2023Harnessing Scalable Transactional Stream Processing for Managing Large Language Models [Vision]17 Jul 2023
- 2023COURIER: Contrastive User Intention Reconstruction for Large-Scale Visual Recommendation8 Jun 2023