mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining Language Models' Predictions with High-Impact Concepts

arXiv 2305.02160 ↗First posted 3 May 2023cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of large-scale pretrained language models has posed unprecedented challenges in deriving explanations of why the model has made some predictions. Stemmed from the compositional nature of languages, spurious correlations have further undermined the trustworthiness of NLP systems, leading to unreliable model explanations that are merely correlated with the output predictions. To encourage fairness and transparency, there exists an urgent demand for reliable explanations that allow users to consistently understand the model's behavior. In this work, we propose a complete framework for extending concept-based interpretability methods to NLP. Specifically, we propose a post-hoc interpretability method for extracting predictive high-level features (concepts) from the pretrained model's hidden layer activations. We optimize for features whose existence causes the output predictions to change substantially, ie generates a high impact. Moreover, we devise several evaluation metrics that can be universally applied. Extensive experiments on real and synthetic tasks demonstrate that our method achieves superior results on predictive impact, usability, and faithfulness compared to the baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 May 2023.

Builds on

25 of 39 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  6. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  7. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  8. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  9. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  10. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  11. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  12. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
13 more
  1. 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 642
  2. 2020Transformer Interpretability Beyond Attention Visualizationcited by 620
  3. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
  4. 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
  5. 2013Direct and Indirect Effectscited by 276
  6. 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
  7. 2021Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving Modelscited by 219
  8. 2021Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction, Interpretation and Beyondcited by 177
  9. 2018Isolating Sources of Disentanglement in Variational Autoencoderscited by 167
  10. 2017A causal framework for explaining the predictions of black-box sequence-to-sequence modelscited by 58
  11. 2022Discovering Latent Concepts Learned in BERTcited by 56
  12. 2019On the Linguistic Representational Power of Neural Machine Translation Modelscited by 34
  13. 2018Causal Learning and Explanation of Deep Neural Networks via Autoencoded Activationscited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6.

7 papers.