Task-Aware Risk Estimation of Perception Failures for Autonomous Vehicles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Safety and performance are key enablers for autonomous driving: on the one hand we want our autonomous vehicles (AVs) to be safe, while at the same time their performance (e.g., comfort or progression) is key to adoption. To effectively walk the tight-rope between safety and performance, AVs need to be risk-averse, but not entirely risk-avoidant. To facilitate safe-yet-performant driving, in this paper, we develop a task-aware risk estimator that assesses the risk a perception failure poses to the AV's motion plan. If the failure has no bearing on the safety of the AV's motion plan, then regardless of how egregious the perception failure is, our task-aware risk estimator considers the failure to have a low risk; on the other hand, if a seemingly benign perception failure severely impacts the motion plan, then our estimator considers it to have a high risk. In this paper, we propose a task-aware risk estimator to decide whether a safety maneuver needs to be triggered. To estimate the task-aware risk, first, we leverage the perception failure - detected by a perception monitor - to synthesize an alternative plausible model for the vehicle's surroundings. The risk due to the perception failure is then formalized as the "relative" risk to the AV's motion plan between the perceived and the alternative plausible scenario. We employ a statistical tool called copula, which models tail dependencies between distributions, to estimate this risk. The theoretical properties of the copula allow us to compute probably approximately correct (PAC) estimates of the risk. We evaluate our task-aware risk estimator using NuPlan and compare it with established baselines, showing that the proposed risk estimator achieves the best F1-score (doubling the score of the best baseline) and exhibits a good balance between recall and precision, i.e., a good balance of safety and performance.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 May 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
7 papers.
- 2023Resilient Legged Local Navigation: Learning to Traverse with Compromised Perception End-to-Endcited by 16
- 2024Customizable Perturbation Synthesis for Robust SLAM Benchmarkingcited by 5
- 2024Hard Cases Detection in Motion Prediction by Vision-Language Foundation Modelscited by 4
- 2026Can Attribution Predict Risk? From Multi-View Attribution to Planning Risk Signals in End-to-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 2
- 2025Driving Through Uncertainty: Risk-Averse Control with LLM Commonsense for Autonomous Driving under Perception Deficitscited by 0
- 2026Temperature Scaling Attack Disrupting Model Confidence in Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026The Decision Value of Perception Computecited by 0
- 2026The Decision Value of Perception Compute28 Sep 2026
- 2026Can Attribution Predict Risk? From Multi-View Attribution to Planning Risk Signals in End-to-End Autonomous Driving7 May 2026
- 2026Temperature Scaling Attack Disrupting Model Confidence in Federated Learning6 Feb 2026
- 2025Driving Through Uncertainty: Risk-Averse Control with LLM Commonsense for Autonomous Driving under Perception Deficits10 Mar 2025
- 2024Hard Cases Detection in Motion Prediction by Vision-Language Foundation Models31 May 2024
- 2024Customizable Perturbation Synthesis for Robust SLAM Benchmarking12 Feb 2024
- 2023Resilient Legged Local Navigation: Learning to Traverse with Compromised Perception End-to-End5 Oct 2023