mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Defining Replicability of Prediction Rules

arXiv 2305.01518 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2023stat.ME cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this article I propose an approach for defining replicability for prediction rules. Motivated by a recent NAS report, I start from the perspective that replicability is obtaining consistent results across studies suitable to address the same prediction question, each of which has obtained its own data. I then discuss concept and issues in defining key elements of this statement. I focus specifically on the meaning of "consistent results" in typical utilization contexts, and propose a multi-agent framework for defining replicability, in which agents are neither partners nor adversaries. I recover some of the prevalent practical approaches as special cases. I hope to provide guidance for a more systematic assessment of replicability in machine learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2023.

Builds on

10 of 58 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  2. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
  3. 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 766
  4. 2018An introduction to domain adaptation and transfer learningcited by 112
  5. 2019Veridical Data Sciencecited by 66
  6. 2018Terminologies for Reproducible Researchcited by 11
  7. 2022Improving the repeatability of deep learning models with Monte Carlo dropoutcited by 11
  8. 2019Quantifying replicability and consistency in systematic reviewscited by 2
  9. 2020Integration of Survival Data from Multiple Studiescited by 2
  10. 2013Deciding whether follow-up studies have replicated findings in a preliminary large-scale "omics' study"cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.