Defining Replicability of Prediction Rules
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this article I propose an approach for defining replicability for prediction rules. Motivated by a recent NAS report, I start from the perspective that replicability is obtaining consistent results across studies suitable to address the same prediction question, each of which has obtained its own data. I then discuss concept and issues in defining key elements of this statement. I focus specifically on the meaning of "consistent results" in typical utilization contexts, and propose a multi-agent framework for defining replicability, in which agents are neither partners nor adversaries. I recover some of the prevalent practical approaches as special cases. I hope to provide guidance for a more systematic assessment of replicability in machine learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2023.
Builds on
10 of 58 references.
References · 10
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
- 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 762
- 2018An introduction to domain adaptation and transfer learningcited by 112
- 2019Veridical Data Sciencecited by 65
- 2018Terminologies for Reproducible Researchcited by 11
- 2022Improving the repeatability of deep learning models with Monte Carlo dropoutcited by 11
- 2019Quantifying replicability and consistency in systematic reviewscited by 2
- 2020Integration of Survival Data from Multiple Studiescited by 2
- 2013Deciding whether follow-up studies have replicated findings in a preliminary large-scale "omics' study"cited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.