Double and Single Descent in Causal Inference with an Application to High-Dimensional Synthetic Control
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Motivated by a recent literature on the double-descent phenomenon in machine learning, we consider highly over-parameterized models in causal inference, including synthetic control with many control units. In such models, there may be so many free parameters that the model fits the training data perfectly. We first investigate high-dimensional linear regression for imputing wage data and estimating average treatment effects, where we find that models with many more covariates than sample size can outperform simple ones. We then document the performance of high-dimensional synthetic control estimators with many control units. We find that adding control units can help improve imputation performance even beyond the point where the pre-treatment fit is perfect. We provide a unified theoretical perspective on the performance of these high-dimensional models. Specifically, we show that more complex models can be interpreted as model-averaging estimators over simpler ones, which we link to an improvement in average performance. This perspective yields concrete insights into the use of synthetic control when control units are many relative to the number of pre-treatment periods.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2023.
Builds on
13 of 27 references.
References · 13
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 508
- 2020Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of Generalizationcited by 480
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 410
- 2018Just Interpolate: Kernel "Ridgeless" Regression Can Generalizecited by 190
- 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 186
- 2021Fit without fear: remarkable mathematical phenomena of deep learning through the prism of interpolationcited by 130
- 2021Causal Matrix Completioncited by 45
- 2018The Augmented Synthetic Control Methodcited by 25
- 2021Interpolating Classifiers Make Few Mistakescited by 22
- 2022Same Root Different Leaves: Time Series and Cross-Sectional Methods in Panel Datacited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Asymptotically Unbiased Synthetic Control Methods by Moment Matchingcited by 2
- 2023Prediction Risk and Estimation Risk of the Ridgeless Least Squares Estimator under General Assumptions on Regression Errorscited by 0
- 2023Benign overfitting beyond prediction: The ordinary least squares interpolatorcited by 0
- 2026Targeted Synthetic Control Methodcited by 0
- 2026Targeted Synthetic Control Method4 Feb 2026
- 2023Benign overfitting beyond prediction: The ordinary least squares interpolator27 Sep 2023
- 2023Asymptotically Unbiased Synthetic Control Methods by Moment Matching20 Jul 2023
- 2023Prediction Risk and Estimation Risk of the Ridgeless Least Squares Estimator under General Assumptions on Regression Errors22 May 2023