On the 1-Wasserstein Distance between Location-Scale Distributions and the Effect of Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We provide an exact expressions for the 1-Wasserstein distance between independent location-scale distributions. The expressions are represented using location and scale parameters and special functions such as the standard Gaussian CDF or the Gamma function. Specifically, we find that the 1-Wasserstein distance between independent univariate location-scale distributions is equivalent to the mean of a folded distribution within the same family whose underlying location and scale are equal to the difference of the locations and scales of the original distributions. A new linear upper bound on the 1-Wasserstein distance is presented and the asymptotic bounds of the 1-Wasserstein distance are detailed in the Gaussian case. The effect of differential privacy using the Laplace and Gaussian mechanisms on the 1-Wasserstein distance is studied using the closed-form expressions and bounds.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2023.
Builds on
5 of 26 references.
References · 5
- 2018Statistical Aspects of Wasserstein Distancescited by 202
- 2014On the folded normal distributioncited by 31
- 2019Deconstructing Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 15
- 2020Distributionally-Robust Machine Learning Using Locally Differentially-Private Datacited by 3
- 2021Market Value of Differentially-Private Smart Meter Datacited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024Disentangling impact of capacity, objective, batchsize, estimators, and step-size on flow VIcited by 5
- 2024Towards a framework on tabular synthetic data generation: a minimalist approach: theory, use cases, and limitationscited by 3
- 2024Deterministic Uncertainty Propagation for Improved Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2025Bayesian Experimental Design for Model Discrepancy Calibration: An Auto-Differentiable Ensemble Kalman Inversion Approachcited by 2
- 2024A Robust Quantile Huber Loss With Interpretable Parameter Adjustment In Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2025Uncertainty-driven Embedding Convolutioncited by 0
- 2026Bayesian Experimental Design for Model Discrepancy Calibration: A Rivalry between Kullback--Leibler Divergence and Wasserstein Distancecited by 0
- 2026Bayesian Experimental Design for Model Discrepancy Calibration: A Rivalry between Kullback--Leibler Divergence and Wasserstein Distance23 Jan 2026
- 2025Uncertainty-driven Embedding Convolution28 Jul 2025
- 2025Bayesian Experimental Design for Model Discrepancy Calibration: An Auto-Differentiable Ensemble Kalman Inversion Approach29 Apr 2025
- 2024Disentangling impact of capacity, objective, batchsize, estimators, and step-size on flow VI11 Dec 2024
- 2024Towards a framework on tabular synthetic data generation: a minimalist approach: theory, use cases, and limitations17 Nov 2024
- 2024Deterministic Uncertainty Propagation for Improved Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning6 Jun 2024
- 2024A Robust Quantile Huber Loss With Interpretable Parameter Adjustment In Distributional Reinforcement Learning4 Jan 2024