mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Earning Extra Performance from Restrictive Feedbacks

arXiv 2304.14831 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2023cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many machine learning applications encounter a situation where model providers are required to further refine the previously trained model so as to gratify the specific need of local users. This problem is reduced to the standard model tuning paradigm if the target data is permissibly fed to the model. However, it is rather difficult in a wide range of practical cases where target data is not shared with model providers but commonly some evaluations about the model are accessible. In this paper, we formally set up a challenge named Earning eXtra PerformancE from restriCTive feEDdbacks (EXPECTED) to describe this form of model tuning problems. Concretely, EXPECTED admits a model provider to access the operational performance of the candidate model multiple times via feedback from a local user (or a group of users). The goal of the model provider is to eventually deliver a satisfactory model to the local user(s) by utilizing the feedbacks. Unlike existing model tuning methods where the target data is always ready for calculating model gradients, the model providers in EXPECTED only see some feedbacks which could be as simple as scalars, such as inference accuracy or usage rate. To enable tuning in this restrictive circumstance, we propose to characterize the geometry of the model performance with regard to model parameters through exploring the parameters' distribution. In particular, for the deep models whose parameters distribute across multiple layers, a more query-efficient algorithm is further tailor-designed that conducts layerwise tuning with more attention to those layers which pay off better. Extensive experiments on different applications demonstrate that our work forges a sound solution to the EXPECTED problem. Code is available via https://github.com/kylejingli/EXPECTED.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2023.

Builds on

35 of 76 references.

References · 35

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  5. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  6. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  7. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  8. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  9. 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,917
  10. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
  11. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,329
  12. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 1,001
23 more
  1. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
  2. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
  3. 2013DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognitioncited by 424
  4. 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 377
  5. 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
  6. 2020Pretrained Transformers Improve Out-of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 294
  7. 2016Revisiting Batch Normalization For Practical Domain Adaptationcited by 288
  8. 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 231
  9. 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 221
  10. 2015Simultaneous Deep Transfer Across Domains and Taskscited by 206
  11. 2017Machine Learning Models that Remember Too Muchcited by 169
  12. 2021Bayesian Optimization is Superior to Random Search for Machine Learning Hyperparameter Tuning: Analysis of the Black-Box Optimization Challenge 2020cited by 148
  13. 2017On the Properties of the Softmax Function with Application in Game Theory and Reinforcement Learningcited by 142
  14. 2020Few-shot Image Generation with Elastic Weight Consolidationcited by 122
  15. 2018Greedy Layerwise Learning Can Scale to ImageNetcited by 115
  16. 2019NATTACK: Learning the Distributions of Adversarial Examples for an Improved Black-Box Attack on Deep Neural Networkscited by 94
  17. 2020Tent: Fully Test-time Adaptation by Entropy Minimizationcited by 69
  18. 2019On Network Design Spaces for Visual Recognitioncited by 68
  19. 2020Accuracy and Fairness Trade-offs in Machine Learning: A Stochastic Multi-Objective Approachcited by 39
  20. 2021Set-valued classification -- overview via a unified frameworkcited by 27
  21. 2022Data-Efficient Graph Grammar Learning for Molecular Generationcited by 26
  22. 2020Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in the Absence of Source Datacited by 14
  23. 2020A Comprehensive Analysis of Information Leakage in Deep Transfer Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.

3 papers.