mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Differentiable Sensor Layouts for End-to-End Learning of Task-Specific Camera Parameters

arXiv 2304.14736 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2023cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The success of deep learning is frequently described as the ability to train all parameters of a network on a specific application in an end-to-end fashion. Yet, several design choices on the camera level, including the pixel layout of the sensor, are considered as pre-defined and fixed, and high resolution, regular pixel layouts are considered to be the most generic ones in computer vision and graphics, treating all regions of an image as equally important. While several works have considered non-uniform, eg, hexagonal or foveated, pixel layouts in hardware and image processing, the layout has not been integrated into the end-to-end learning paradigm so far. In this work, we present the first truly end-to-end trained imaging pipeline that optimizes the size and distribution of pixels on the imaging sensor jointly with the parameters of a given neural network on a specific task. We derive an analytic, differentiable approach for the sensor layout parameterization that allows for task-specific, local varying pixel resolutions. We present two pixel layout parameterization functions: rectangular and curvilinear grid shapes that retain a regular topology. We provide a drop-in module that approximates sensor simulation given existing high-resolution images to directly connect our method with existing deep learning models. We show that network predictions benefit from learnable pixel layouts for two different downstream tasks, classification and semantic segmentation.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2023.

Builds on

16 of 28 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  5. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
  6. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,472
  7. 2017SplineCNN: Fast Geometric Deep Learning with Continuous B-Spline Kernelscited by 160
  8. 2019Deep Optics for Monocular Depth Estimation and 3D Object Detectioncited by 65
  9. 2019Deep Optics for Single-shot High-dynamic-range Imagingcited by 62
  10. 2021Learning to Resize Images for Computer Vision Taskscited by 45
  11. 2019Efficient Segmentation: Learning Downsampling Near Semantic Boundariescited by 33
  12. 2016Learning Sensor Multiplexing Design through Back-propagationcited by 28
4 more
  1. 2022Learning strides in convolutional neural networkscited by 25
  2. 2020Superpixel Image Classification with Graph Attention Networkscited by 20
  3. 2021Learning to Downsample for Segmentation of Ultra-High Resolution Imagescited by 19
  4. 2021Mask-ToF: Learning Microlens Masks for Flying Pixel Correction in Time-of-Flight Imagingcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.