Propagating Kernel Ambiguity Sets in Nonlinear Data-driven Dynamics Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper provides answers to an open problem: given a nonlinear data-driven dynamical system model, e.g., kernel conditional mean embedding (CME) and Koopman operator, how can one propagate the ambiguity sets forward for multiple steps? This problem is the key to solving distributionally robust control and learning-based control of such learned system models under a data-distribution shift. Different from previous works that use either static ambiguity sets, e.g., fixed Wasserstein balls, or dynamic ambiguity sets under known piece-wise linear (or affine) dynamics, we propose an algorithm that exactly propagates ambiguity sets through nonlinear data-driven models using the Koopman operator and CME, via the kernel maximum mean discrepancy geometry. Through both theoretical and numerical analysis, we show that our kernel ambiguity sets are the natural geometric structure for the learned data-driven dynamical system models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2023.
Builds on
11 of 40 references.
References · 11
- 2015Data-driven Distributionally Robust Optimization Using the Wasserstein Metric: Performance Guarantees and Tractable Reformulationscited by 285
- 2018Gaussian Processes and Kernel Methods: A Review on Connections and Equivalencescited by 188
- 2016Linear predictors for nonlinear dynamical systems: Koopman operator meets model predictive controlcited by 134
- 2020A Measure-Theoretic Approach to Kernel Conditional Mean Embeddingscited by 86
- 2022Learning Dynamical Systems via Koopman Operator Regression in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spacescited by 66
- 2022Optimal Rates for Regularized Conditional Mean Embedding Learningcited by 50
- 2017Eigendecompositions of Transfer Operators in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spacescited by 48
- 2017A Linear-Time Kernel Goodness-of-Fit Testcited by 41
- 2018Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Stochastic Control: A Data-Driven Approachcited by 27
- 2018Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Kalman Filteringcited by 17
- 2022Maximum Mean Discrepancy Distributionally Robust Nonlinear Chance-Constrained Optimization with Finite-Sample Guaranteecited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.