mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cross-Domain Evaluation of POS Taggers: From Wall Street Journal to Fandom Wiki

arXiv 2304.13989 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2023cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Wall Street Journal section of the Penn Treebank has been the de-facto standard for evaluating POS taggers for a long time, and accuracies over 97% have been reported. However, less is known about out-of-domain tagger performance, especially with fine-grained label sets. Using data from Elder Scrolls Fandom, a wiki about the textitElder Scrolls video game universe, we create a modest dataset for qualitatively evaluating the cross-domain performance of two POS taggers: the Stanford tagger (Toutanova et al. 2003) and Bilty (Plank et al. 2016), both trained on WSJ. Our analyses show that performance on tokens seen during training is almost as good as in-domain performance, but accuracy on unknown tokens decreases from 90.37% to 78.37% (Stanford) and 87.84% to 80.41% (Bilty) across domains. Both taggers struggle with proper nouns and inconsistent capitalization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2023.

Builds on

1 of 10 references.

References · 1

  1. 2016Multilingual Part-of-Speech Tagging with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Models and Auxiliary Losscited by 30

Built on by

Not cited yet.