mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Empirical Evaluation of ChatGPT on Requirements Information Retrieval Under Zero-Shot Setting

arXiv 2304.12562 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2023cs.SE cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, various illustrative examples have shown the impressive ability of generative large language models (LLMs) to perform NLP related tasks. ChatGPT undoubtedly is the most representative model. We empirically evaluate ChatGPT's performance on requirements information retrieval (IR) tasks to derive insights into designing or developing more effective requirements retrieval methods or tools based on generative LLMs. We design an evaluation framework considering four different combinations of two popular IR tasks and two common artifact types. Under zero-shot setting, evaluation results reveal ChatGPT's promising ability to retrieve requirements relevant information (high recall) and limited ability to retrieve more specific requirements information (low precision). Our evaluation of ChatGPT on requirements IR under zero-shot setting provides preliminary evidence for designing or developing more effective requirements IR methods or tools based on LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2023.

Builds on

11 of 70 references.

References · 11

  1. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  2. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  3. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
  4. 2023An Analysis of the Automatic Bug Fixing Performance of ChatGPTcited by 108
  5. 2023Exploring the Feasibility of ChatGPT for Event Extractioncited by 76
  6. 2022NLP-based Automated Compliance Checking of Data Processing Agreements against GDPRcited by 18
  7. 2020Generating Question Titles for Stack Overflow from Mined Code Snippetscited by 10
  8. 2021Automatically Matching Bug Reports With Related App Reviewscited by 8
  9. 2022Machine Learning for Software Engineering: A Tertiary Studycited by 7
  10. 2023Strategies, Benefits and Challenges of App Store-inspired Requirements Elicitationcited by 4
  11. 2020Emerging App Issue Identification via Online Joint Sentiment-Topic Tracingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 2.

6 papers.