Improving Classification Neural Networks by using Absolute activation function (MNIST/LeNET-5 example)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The paper discusses the use of the Absolute activation function in classification neural networks. An examples are shown of using this activation function in simple and more complex problems. Using as a baseline LeNet-5 network for solving the MNIST problem, the efficiency of Absolute activation function is shown in comparison with the use of Tanh, ReLU and SeLU activations. It is shown that in deep networks Absolute activation does not cause vanishing and exploding gradients, and therefore Absolute activation can be used in both simple and deep neural networks. Due to high volatility of training networks with Absolute activation, a special modification of ADAM training algorithm is used, that estimates lower bound of accuracy at any test dataset using validation dataset analysis at each training epoch, and uses this value to stop/decrease learning rate, and re-initializes ADAM algorithm between these steps. It is shown that solving the MNIST problem with the LeNet-like architectures based on Absolute activation allows to significantly reduce the number of trained parameters in the neural network with improving the prediction accuracy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2023.
Builds on
6 of 20 references.
References · 6
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2020A survey on modern trainable activation functionscited by 89
- 2015Neural Network with Unbounded Activation Functions is Universal Approximatorcited by 63
- 2022APTx: better activation function than MISH, SWISH, and ReLU's variants used in deep learningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.