mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Deep Learning algorithm to accelerate Algebraic Multigrid methods in Finite Element solvers of 3D elliptic PDEs

arXiv 2304.10832 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2023math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Algebraic multigrid (AMG) methods are among the most efficient solvers for linear systems of equations and they are widely used for the solution of problems stemming from the discretization of Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). The most severe limitation of AMG methods is the dependence on parameters that require to be fine-tuned. In particular, the strong threshold parameter is the most relevant since it stands at the basis of the construction of successively coarser grids needed by the AMG methods. We introduce a novel Deep Learning algorithm that minimizes the computational cost of the AMG method when used as a finite element solver. We show that our algorithm requires minimal changes to any existing code. The proposed Artificial Neural Network (ANN) tunes the value of the strong threshold parameter by interpreting the sparse matrix of the linear system as a black-and-white image and exploiting a pooling operator to transform it into a small multi-channel image. We experimentally prove that the pooling successfully reduces the computational cost of processing a large sparse matrix and preserves the features needed for the regression task at hand. We train the proposed algorithm on a large dataset containing problems with a highly heterogeneous diffusion coefficient defined in different three-dimensional geometries and discretized with unstructured grids and linear elasticity problems with a highly heterogeneous Young's modulus. When tested on problems with coefficients or geometries not present in the training dataset, our approach reduces the computational time by up to 30%.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2023.

Builds on

17 of 84 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  4. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  5. 2015Recent Advances in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 360
  6. 2019Prediction of Aerodynamic Flow Fields Using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 144
  7. 2021Enhancing Computational Fluid Dynamics with Machine Learningcited by 137
  8. 2020A comprehensive deep learning-based approach to reduced order modeling of nonlinear time-dependent parametrized PDEscited by 105
  9. 2019Learning to Optimize Multigrid PDE Solverscited by 79
  10. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Deep Neural Networks and Parametric PDEscited by 74
  11. 2020Learning Algebraic Multigrid Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 54
  12. 2021Optimization-Based Algebraic Multigrid Coarsening Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 21
5 more
  1. 2018A machine learning framework for data driven acceleration of computations of differential equationscited by 18
  2. 2021Refinement of polygonal grids using Convolutional Neural Networks with applications to polygonal Discontinuous Galerkin and Virtual Element methodscited by 5
  3. 2022Agglomeration of Polygonal Grids using Graph Neural Networks with applications to Multigrid solverscited by 3
  4. 2022Machine Learning based refinement strategies for polyhedral grids with applications to Virtual Element and polyhedral Discontinuous Galerkin methodscited by 2
  5. 2022A data-driven approach for the closure of RANS models by the divergence of the Reynolds Stress Tensorcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

6 papers.